e-Curriculum as Perceived by Teachers: Jordan as an Example

Table 2

Means, standard deviations, ranks, and degree of the study sample on the field of Electronic Assessment.

No.	Item	Mean	Std. deviation	Rank	Degree
65	The electronic assessment reflects students’ actual results	2.73	1.12	1	Medium
59	The electronic assessment considers the students’ level and individual differences	2.67	1.02	2	Medium
58	The electronic assessment employs different assessment strategies like performance-based assessment	2.63	0.99	3	Medium
64	The electronic assessment provides teachers with different kinds of assessment such as diagnostic, formative, interim, and summative	2.59	1.00	4	Medium
60	Electronic assessment motivates students’ scientific thinking	2.58	1.00	5	Medium
56	Electronic assessment takes the students’ knowledge and linguistic skills into account	2.57	1.01	6	Medium
57	The electronic assessment employs multiple tools, including a checklist and rubric	2.57	1.00	6	Medium
62	The electronic assessment provides teachers with an ongoing form of assessment	2.57	0.98	6	Medium
63	Electronic assessment results help teachers to develop their students’ performance	2.57	1.00	6	Medium
61	The electronic assessment provides students with immediate feedback	2.54	0.98	10	Medium
55	Electronic assessment matches the units’ general objectives	2.40	0.93	11	Medium
	Electronic Assessment	2.58	0.87		Medium

Bold highlights the total average values.