Review Article

Multiple Myeloma in People of Working Age: A Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis of Experiences of Paid and Unpaid Work

Table 2

Detailed study characteristics.

AuthorYearLocationSample sizeMean age (range)Patient/family or both

Coon2004aUSA2152 (36–70)Patient
Coon2004bUSA2152 (38–70)Patient
Johansson2005Sweden1256 (37–70)Patient
Fine Dahan2006USA657 (50–66)Patient
Vlossak2008Canada2059 (44–88)Patient
McGrath2009Australia10 (8 with myeloma)53.9 (23–72)Patient
Potrata2010UK1558.2 (42–75)Patient
Maher2011UK8Not specified (48–74)Patient
Kelly2011Ireland1163 (42–83)Patient
Molassiotis2011UK20 (patients)61.8 (not specified)Both
16 (family)
Potrata2011UK1558.2 (42–75)Patient
Craike2013Australia2462 (48–78)Patient
Osborne2014UK3164 (median) (41–81)Patient
Baz2015USA2060.4 (48–77)Patient
Wagland2015Australia548 (not specified)Patient
Cormican2016Ireland8 patientsNot specified (55–85)Patient
Morris2017UK7 (family)55.6Family
Asfaw2018USA2059 (29–71)Patient
Cormican2018Ireland15 (patients)66 (51–80)Both
9 (family)
Clifton2018Australia18 (3 with myeloma)51 (45–61)Patient
Monterosso2018Australia1456.5 (age range: 36–74)Patient
De Wet2019Australia1562 (51–74)Patient
Parsons2019Canada3266 (51–83)Patient
Quinoa-Salanova2019Spain12Mean not specified (40–>70)Family
Cuffe2020Ireland667.5 (63–73)Patient
Jen2020Singapore12 (patients)Ages not specifiedBoth
12 (family)
Bennink2021Netherlands954 (47–59)Patient
Gries2021USA3069 (55–88)Patient
He2021UK, France, Germany3060 (not specified)Patient
Janssens2021Belgium, Finland, Romania, Spain2461 (46–73)Patient
LeBlanc2021USA1564 (46–88)Patient
Pritlove2021Canada16 (patients)Patient: 65 (57–70)Both
8 (family)Partner: 62 (41–68)
Crawford2022USA, Canada, UK3960 (48–72)Patient
Mccaughan2022UK35 (patients)Mean not specified (50–80)Both
10 (family)