Patient Experiences of a Telehealth Multidisciplinary Cancer Rehabilitation Programme: Qualitative Findings from the ReStOre@Home Feasibility Study

Table 2

Participant (N = 10) group characteristics, technology access and literacy.

Sex (n)				Value
Male				9
Female				1
Cancer type (n)
Oesophageal				8
Gastric and lung				1
Gastro-oesophageal junction				1
Neoadjuvant treatment (n)				6
Adjuvant treatment (n)				3
Age (years) (x̄ (SD, range))				67 (6.68, 58–76)
Time since surgery (months) (x̄ (SD, range))				10 (3.7, 5–17)
Hospital length of stay (days) (x̄ (SD, range))				24 (22.29, 6–79)
Technology access and literacy (n)
Access to the broadband in own home				9
Access to a suitable device for video calls				8
Independently operated video calls				7
Independently operated watch				7
Participant ID	Sex	Age	Time since surgery (months)		Ability to independently operate video calls
Participant01	Male	58	13		Yes
Participant02	Male	58	11		Yes
Participant04	Male	74	7		No
Participant05	Male	72	13		No
Participant06	Male	76	7		Yes
Participant07	Male	69	10		Yes
Participant09	Male	61	11		Yes
Participant10	Female	65	7		No
Participant11	Male	63	17		Yes
Participant12	Male	72	5		Yes

Note. The criteria of “ability to independently operate video calls” are used as an indicator of participants’ digital skills.