Different Coping Constructs in Haematological Cancer Patients: The Influence of Dyadic on Individual Coping Interplay of DC and IC in Haematological Cancer

Table 3

Pearson correlations of DC and IC subscales at t1 and t2 (N = 214).

		DC (t2)					IC (t2)
	Subscales DC/IC	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
DC (t1)	(1) Stress communication	0.622	0.367	−0.276	0.003	0.322	0.184	0.180	0.201	0.001	0.152
	(2) Supportive DC^†	0.337	0.684	−0.385	0.388	0.601	−0.099	0.262	0.138	−0.112	0.208
	(3) Negative DC	−0.176	−0.317	0.656	−0.150	−0.281	0.172	−0.084	−0.023	0.199	−0.155
	(4) Delegated DC	−0.130	0.254	−0.070	0.528	0.175	−0.194	−0.018	0.009	−0.089	−0.028
	(5) Common DC	0.343	0.544	−0.395	0.270	0.670	−0.210	0.338	0.136	−0.104	0.162
IC (t1)	(6) Depressive IC^ǂ	0.073	−0.008	0.207	−0.097	−0.133	0.666	−0.126	0.240	0.262	−0.148
	(7) Active IC	0.241	0.236	−0.194	0.007	0.335	−0.107	0.563	0.231	0.035	0.262
	(8) Distraction	0.102	0.050	−0.074	−0.059	0.186	0.116	0.265	0.450	0.155	0.133
	(9) Trivialization	−0.037	−0.174	0.180	−0.136	−0.116	0.293	−0.059	0.134	0.489	−0.049
	(10) Compliance	−0.009	0.145	−0.133	0.047	0.192	−0.335	0.179	0.046	−0.100	0.624

; . ^†DC, dyadic coping; ^ǂIC, individual coping.