Research Article

Different Coping Constructs in Haematological Cancer Patients: The Influence of Dyadic on Individual Coping Interplay of DC and IC in Haematological Cancer

Table 4

Regression analyses for baseline (t1) variables predicting IC strategies of haematological cancer patients (N = 214) at follow-up (t2).

Predictors t1Depressive ICt2Active IC t2Distraction t2Trivialization t2Compliance t2
BSEβBSEβBSEβBSEβBSEβ

Sex (1, female; 0, male)−0.0150.090−0.010−0.2290.125−0.126−0.1240.159−0.058−0.0130.137−0.0060.0350.0970.025
Age−0.0070.005−0.1110.0120.0080.1690.0120.0100.1360.0300.0080.3660.0160.0060.285
SESǂ (1, high; 0, others)−0.0590.087−0.0400.0600.1210.0330.0360.1540.016−0.3170.133−0.157−0.0440.094−0.030
Relationship duration<0.0010.004−0.005−0.0020.006−0.031−0.0030.008−0.040−0.0140.007−0.2120.0030.0050.068
Relationship satisfaction−0.0260.012−0.172−0.0010.017−0.0030.0100.0220.045−0.0330.019−0.1630.0080.0130.056
HSCT§ (1, yes; 0, others)−0.0880.085−0.0610.2090.1170.1170.1120.1490.053−0.4420.129−0.2260.1760.0920.126
Psychological distress0.1110.0180.403−0.0190.026−0.0560.0760.0320.1870.0650.0280.174<0.0010.020<0.001
Stress communication0.0930.0550.1200.0880.0760.0910.1180.0960.1030.0230.0830.0220.0320.0590.043
Supportive DC0.0370.0810.0370.1430.1120.1160.0450.1420.0310.0050.1230.0040.1930.0880.202
Negative DC0.0600.0680.0610.0510.0940.0420.0300.0210.0210.1170.1040.087−0.1000.074−0.106
Delegated DC−0.0670.052−0.083−0.1360.072−0.1350.0220.0920.019−0.0410.080−0.037−0.0530.056−0.067
Common DC−0.0870.073−0.1020.2670.1010.2510.0620.1270.0490.0280.1100.024−0.0610.078−0.075

Constant2.5581.1811.3541.4132.862
0.3170.1550.0320.1520.150

; ; . IC, individual coping; ǂSES, socioeconomic status; §HSCT, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; DC, dyadic coping; B, unstandardized regression coefficient; β, standardized regression coefficient; SE, standard error of B. Sex, SES, and SCT were dummy-coded.