Research Article

Laparoscopic Intervention to Pancreatic Pseudocyst Confers Short-Term Benefits: A Meta-Analysis

Table 1

Baseline characteristics and demographics of patients included.

First author, yearNumberAgeGender (male/female)BMI (kg/m2)Etiology (alcoholic/biliary/traumatic/idiopathic/other)Size of PPNOS score
LGOGLGOGLGOGLGOGLGOGLGOG

Cervantes et al., 200410642.25 ± 14.7236.00 ± 10.396/45/122.5 ± 2.821.2 ± 2.44/4/0/0/24/1/0/0/1NRNR8
Melman et al., 2013162246.50 ± 3.652.0 ± 3.810/610/1229.2 ± 1.828.6 ± 1.5NRNR10.4 ± 0.59.5 ± 0.88
Oida et al., 2011101857.4 ± 10.855.4 ± 13.50/102/16NRNR8/0/0/2/011/0/1/6/015.5 ± 3.114.2 ± 1.87
Khaled et al., 2014301055 ± 12.2557.75 ± 13.0121/93/726.0 ± 12.028.25 ± 4.9111/13/0/0/05/3/0/0/210.0 ± 3.2513.5 ± 4.639
Redwan et al., 201743251.8 ± 1.948.8 ± 2.32/219/1327.3 ± 1.729.1 ± 1.30/1/3/0/00/19/8/5/010.1 ± 0.89.9 ± 1.19
Wang et al., 2019248107NRNR158/9066/41NRNRNRNRNRNR6

aSignificant difference, , . bThe Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) score.