Laparoscopic Intervention to Pancreatic Pseudocyst Confers Short-Term Benefits: A Meta-Analysis

Table 1

Baseline characteristics and demographics of patients included.

First author, year

Number

Age

Gender (male/female)

BMI (kg/m^2)

Etiology (alcoholic/biliary/traumatic/idiopathic/other)

Size of PP

NOS score

LG

OG

LG

OG

LG

OG

LG

OG

LG

OG

LG

OG

Cervantes et al., 2004

10

6

42.25 ± 14.72

36.00 ± 10.39

6/4

5/1

22.5 ± 2.8

21.2 ± 2.4

4/4/0/0/2

4/1/0/0/1

NR

NR

8

Melman et al., 2013

16

22

46.50 ± 3.6

52.0 ± 3.8

10/6

10/12

29.2 ± 1.8

28.6 ± 1.5

NR

NR

10.4 ± 0.5

9.5 ± 0.8

8

Oida et al., 2011

10

18

57.4 ± 10.8

55.4 ± 13.5

0/10

2/16

NR

NR

8/0/0/2/0

11/0/1/6/0

15.5 ± 3.1

14.2 ± 1.8

7

Khaled et al., 2014

30

10

55 ± 12.25

57.75 ± 13.01

21/9

3/7

26.0 ± 12.0

28.25 ± 4.91

11/13/0/0/0

5/3/0/0/2

10.0 ± 3.25

13.5 ± 4.63

9

Redwan et al., 2017

4

32

51.8 ± 1.9

48.8 ± 2.3

2/2

19/13

27.3 ± 1.7

29.1 ± 1.3

0/1/3/0/0

0/19/8/5/0

10.1 ± 0.8

9.9 ± 1.1

9

Wang et al., 2019

248

107

NR

NR

158/90

66/41

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

6

^aSignificant difference, , . ^bThe Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) score.