Outcomes in Emergency Department Patients with Dyspnea versus Chest Pain: A Retrospective Consecutive Cohort Study

Jemt, Erik; Ekström, Magnus; Ekelund, Ulf

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4031684

Emergency Medicine International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Disclosure Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 4031684 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4031684

Outcomes in Emergency Department Patients with Dyspnea versus Chest Pain: A Retrospective Consecutive Cohort Study

Erik Jemt,¹Magnus Ekström,²and Ulf Ekelund¹

Academic Editor: Chak W. Kam

Received31 Mar 2022

Accepted27 Jul 2022

Published16 Sept 2022

Abstract

Dyspnea and chest pain are major and important causes of contact at the emergency department (ED). Dyspnea is associated with high morbidity and mortality, but data on characteristics and outcomes compared with chest pain in the ED are limited. This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with contact causes of dyspnea or chest pain at two Swedish EDs from 2010 to 2014. Hospital admittance, ED revisits, and mortality were analyzed using multivariable regression models, adjusted for ED and markers of disease severity (age, sex, centre, Charlson comorbidity index, c-reactive protein, troponin T, and arrival by ambulance). 29,291 patients (mean age 58.3 years; 48.9% women) with dyspnea (n = 8,812) or chest pain (n = 20,479) were included. Dyspnea patients were older than patients with chest pain (64 vs. 56 years, ) and had more comorbidity and higher average blood troponin T and c-reactive protein levels. Dyspnea patients also had higher hospitalization rates (48% vs. 30%; adjOR (95% CI) 2.1–2.3), including the intensive care unit (1.4% vs. 0.1%; adjOR 6.9–15.9), and more ED revisits (11% vs. 7%; adjOR 1.2–1.7) in 30 days. Dyspnea patients had five-fold increased mortality compared to those with chest pain; hazard ratio (HR) 5.1 (4.8–5.4), adjusted for markers of disease severity, the mortality was two-fold higher, HR 2.2 (2.0–2.4). Compared with chest pain patients, ED dyspnea patients are older, have more comorbidity, and have worse outcomes in terms of hospitalization, morbidity, and mortality.

1. Introduction

Dyspnea and chest pain are major and important causes of contact at the emergency department (ED), with dyspnea comprising 5–9% and chest pain 11–13% of total ED admissions [1–3]. The two symptoms often appear together, they can be hard to differentiate, and both can be caused by heart as well as lung disorders. For instance, approximately 50% of the patients with pulmonary embolism have chest pain [4, 5], and acute coronary syndrome manifests with dyspnea in 4–11% of cases [6–8]. In addition, cardiac and lung diseases often occur together, and one can lead to the other, e.g. when chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) causes cor pulmonale [9].

Management of chest pain, with coronary artery disease as the major underlying pathology [3, 10], is well studied, with reliable risk-stratification tools such as the HEART-score [11] and EDACS [12]. Compared to chest pain, the causes of dyspnea are more diverse such as heart diseases, infections, and lung diseases [3, 10], and there are few guidelines and tools for managing dyspnea in the ED.

ED patients with dyspnea have been reported to have higher in-hospital mortality than those with chest pain [3, 10], and compared to patients with other contact causes, dyspnea patients have a higher triage priority [2], longer hospital stay [10], and are more often admitted to intensive care [3]. Indeed, dyspnea at the ED is an independent predictor of short survival [13]. The long-term mortality after exercise testing has been compared in dyspnea and chest pain patients [14], but our knowledge of the similarities and differences in characteristics and outcomes in these patients is otherwise limited.

The aim of this study was to evaluate characteristics and outcomes in patients presenting to the ED with dyspnea compared to chest pain.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Population

This was a retrospective consecutive cohort study using the Evaluation of Unknown Predictors of Electrocardiographic Changes (EXPECT) database [15, 16]. The database includes a vast amount of clinical information from 198,850 consecutive patients aged 18 years or older who presented at five EDs in Denmark and southern Sweden during 2010–2014 and had an electrocardiogram (ECG) registered. Only the first ED contact during the period was included for each person.

2.2. Ethical Considerations

The present study was approved by the Regional Ethics Review Board at Lund (Dnr: 2015/78, 2016/691, 2018/705). Active patient consent was waived by the ethics review board, but individuals were informed about the study and had the opportunity to decline participation.

2.3. Study Sites

The present study included data from the EDs of Lund University Hospital (approximately 65,000 visitors annually) and Helsingborg General Hospital (approximately 80,000 visitors annually) during 2010–2014. Both EDs used the Rapid Emergency Triage and Treatment System (RETTS) [17] for triage during the study period, which mandates an ECG in all patients with dyspnea or chest pain as the main cause of contact. Patients with an ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were most often identified in the prehospital setting and taken directly to the angiography suite, bypassing the ED. These patients were thus not included in the study.

2.4. Assessments and Definitions

From the EXPECT database, we extracted the following data: patient’s age, sex, previous diagnoses, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) [18], ED arrival and departure times, arrival by ambulance or not, admittance to in-hospital or intensive care unit (ICU), length of hospital stay, ED blood tests of high sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), c-reactive protein (CRP), and hemoglobin (Hb), as well as ED revisits and mortality within 7, 30, and 365 days. The variable “arrival by ambulance” was only available at Lund. Sensitivity analyses without adjusting for “arrival by ambulance” yielded similar findings.

The contact causes were defined according to RETTS [17] and were in all cases registered by an experienced triage nurse. Dyspnea was defined as shortness of breath with or without relation to effort and chest pain as pain from the thoracic area with or without relation to breathing. To prevent the overlap between the two groups and ensure that they were mutually exclusive, dyspnea patients with chest pain as a secondary contact cause were excluded, as were chest pain patients with dyspnea as a secondary contact cause. Such overlap was present in only 147 (5%) of the patients.

The date of death was obtained from the Swedish National Population Registry longitudinally up to 31 December 2015. Data on previous medical conditions were retrieved as all the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) diagnoses made within the region (region Skåne) in the five years preceding the ED presentation.

2.5. Statistical Analyses

Patient characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes were compared between the dyspnea and chest pain groups using t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. Differences in outcomes were analyzed using linear regression for continuous outcomes and logistic regression for categorical outcomes. Time of death was analyzed using Cox regression. Associations were expressed with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and were estimated unadjusted and adjusted for potential confounders: age, sex, centre, CCI, CRP, hs-cTnT, and arrival by ambulance. Statistical significance was defined as a two-sided value <0.05. Non-normally distributed continuous variables were analyzed using Wilcoxson’s rank sum test and were reported as median (IQR). Statistical analyses were conducted using the software packages Stata, version 14.2 (StataCorp LP; College Station, TX) and SAS, version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC).

3. Results

We included a total of 29,291 patients (mean age 58.3 years; 49% women) who presented to the ED of Helsingborg (51%) or Lund (49%) with a primary or secondary complaint of dyspnea (n = 8,812) or chest pain (n = 20,479). Characteristics for the groups are shown in Table 1. Compared with chest pain patients, dyspnea patients were older, more often female and had more comorbidity in the form of COPD, heart failure, pulmonary embolism, and pneumonia. However, there was little difference in previous coronary artery disease. The most common previous diseases in the dyspnea group were COPD, heart failure, asthma, and pneumonia, whereas, among those with the chest pain, they were angina pectoris and acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Average CRP and hs-cTnT levels were higher in patients with dyspnea than with chest pain.

Seasonal and diurnal variations in the ED presentation for each contact cause are shown in Figures 1(a) and 1(b). Dyspnea patients had a distinct “peak” in the winter to early spring of the year, while patients with chest pain presented to the ED more evenly throughout the year. Diurnal presentation patterns were similar in the two groups.

(a)

(b)

Outcomes are shown in Table 2. Compared to chest pain patients, dyspnea patients were more often admitted to in-hospital care (47.9% vs. 29.5%), including to the ICU (1.4% vs. 0.1%), and had longer hospital stays and more ED revisits. Mortality was assessed during a median of 3.5 years (range 0–6.0 years), yielding a total of 97,812 person-years of follow-up. Mortality was clearly higher in dyspnea patients at all points of follow-up. As shown in Figure 2, cumulative mortality over time was markedly higher in dyspnea patients (2,917 deaths; incidence rate 0.12 (95% CI, 0.11–0.12) per person-year) compared with chest pain (1,612 deaths; incidence rate 0.022 (95% CI, 0.021–0.023) per person-year). In a Cox regression analysis of time from ED visits to death, dyspnea was associated with five-fold increased mortality compared to chest pain, crude HR 5.1 (95% CI, 4.8–5.4). When controlling for centre and markers of disease severity (age, sex, CCI, CRP, Hs-cTnT, and arrival by ambulance), dyspnea was associated with a two-fold higher mortality, adjusted HR 2.2 (95% CI, 2.0–2.4; ).

4. Discussion

In this large consecutive cohort of ED patients, the main findings were that dyspnea patients had a markedly higher rate of hospitalization, an almost ten-fold higher ICU admittance, more ED revisits, and a five to ten times higher crude mortality compared with ED patients with chest pain. The excess risks in dyspnea patients decreased after adjusting for differences in disease severity (age, sex, centre, CCI, CRP, Hs-cTnT, and arrival by ambulance), indicating that the worse outcomes were largely attributed to more severe underlying illness.

Our study adds novel and important data on morbidity in unselected ED patients with a contact cause of dyspnea or chest pain. Dyspnea patients commonly had previous diagnoses of COPD, heart failure, asthma, and pneumonia, while angina pectoris and previous AMI were more common in chest pain patients. Diabetes and hypertension were common in both groups. Previous COPD, heart failure, asthma, and pneumonia are common in ED patients with dyspnea and have previously been reported in Europe [19], Southeast Asia, and Oceania [1]. However, our dyspnea patients less often had previous COPD or asthma compared to other studies [1, 19]. This might to some extent be explained by lifestyle factors but that needs to be investigated further. In our chest pain patients, the rate of previous angina pectoris and AMI was in accordance with previous reports [20–22].

Dyspnea as a cause of contact was more common in the winter months compared to chest pain. A previous study suggests that ED dyspnea patients in the winter months are typically older and often have a lower respiratory tract infection, COPD, and/or heart failure [23].

Dyspnea patients had markedly worse outcomes than chest pain patients, with e.g. a 10-fold higher 7-day crude mortality, which is well in-line with previous findings of 10 times higher in-hospital mortality for dyspnea compared to chest pain patients [3]. The long-term mortality (median follow-up of 3.5 years) in our dyspnea patients was also markedly higher with a crude HR of 5.1 and an HR of 2.2 when adjusted for disease severity. This mortality estimate is similar to the HR of 1.9–2.9 reported in a comparison of dyspnea and chest pain patients after cardiac stress testing [14].

The novel finding that the HR for mortality decreased from 5.1 to 2.2 when adjusted for age, sex, centre, CCI, CRP, Hs-cTnT, and arrival by ambulance supports that the worse outcomes in the dyspnea group is partly related to more severe underlying illness. The remaining two-fold increased mortality suggests that dyspnea in itself is an independent risk factor, but other factors such as other underlying conditions, lung function and smoking [13], hypercapnia, and/or increased blood levels of creatinine, or markers of heart failure [24] could also explain the poorer outcome. In our study, 16.2% of the dyspnea patients had previous heart failure vs. 4.7% of the chest pain patients and 4.6% vs. 1.6% had renal disease. A similar pattern of worse outcomes in older patients with comorbidities of heart failure, diabetes, and renal disease has also been shown in STEMI patients presenting with dyspnea or other atypical symptoms rather than chest pain [25]. Further research to clarify the factors and mechanisms behind the bad outcome in dyspnea patients is warranted.

A strength of this study was the large consecutive ED patient cohort with a complete follow-up of outcomes using cross-linked registry data. Several clinically relevant variables could be analyzed to evaluate the difference in outcomes between the groups. Another strength was the possibility to rinse for overlap between the two causes of contact. Overlap between the groups of dyspnea and chest pain was present in about 5% of patients, which is in line with previous studies comparing symptoms as causes of contact [24, 26]. However, in studies of individual diagnoses such as STEMI, both chest pain and dyspnea may present in up to 60% of the patients [25]. Avoiding overlap does not abolish the subjectivity of symptom categorization but is important since the chief complaint predicts outcomes and influences ED patient management before the diagnosis is known [3]. One limitation of the study was the lack of data on vital parameters and acuity scores at ED triage, preventing analysis related to severity of illness on arrival. Data were also unavailable on underlying factors such as smoking habits, blood tests, including B-type natriuretic peptides, or data on heart and lung functions. As mentioned, these variables and different markers of disease severity may be relevant to further explain the differences in outcomes between the groups.

The increased morbidity and mortality of dyspnea patients in this study strengthen the evidence that a chief complaint of dyspnea in itself is an early marker of severe disease, indicating a need for prioritized care. The finding that morbidity and mortality to a large part were explained by underlying factors indicates that it should be possible to create risk-stratification tools for ED dyspnea patients, quickly identifying those who will benefit from specific and/or aggressive care, ICU admission, close follow-up at discharge, or perhaps a more palliative approach.

5. Conclusions

This large consecutive cohort study indicates that compared with chest pain patients, ED dyspnea patients are older and have more comorbidity and that they fare markedly worse in terms of hospitalization and mortality. Our findings support that a contact cause of dyspnea is a marker of severe illness and should warrant fast diagnostics and treatment to lower the risk of a bad outcome.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Disclosure

This study was part of the AIR Lund (Artificially Intelligent use of Resisters at Lund University) research environment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

Magnus Ekström was supported by an unrestricted grant from the Swedish Research Council (Dnr: 2019-02081). This study received funding from the Swedish Research Council (VR; grant no. 2019-00198). The authors would like to acknowledge the excellent help of data managers Paul Söderholm, Cecilia Åkesson-Kotsaris, and Helena Hallefjord.

References

A. M. Kelly, G. Keijzers, S. Klim et al., “An observational study of dyspnea in emergency departments: the Asia, Australia, and New Zealand dyspnea in emergency departments study (AANZDEM),” Academic Emergency Medicine, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 328–336, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. M. Langlo, A. B. Orvik, J. Dale, O. Uleberg, and L. P. Bjornsen, “The acute sick and injured patients: an overview of the emergency department patient population at a Norwegian University Hospital Emergency Department,” European Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 175–180, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mockel, J. Searle, R. Muller et al., “Chief complaints in medical emergencies: do they relate to underlying disease and outcome? The Charite Emergency Medicine Study (CHARITEM),” European Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 103–108, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Halevy and M. Cushman, “Pulmonary embolism for the cardiologist: emphasis on diagnosis,” Current Cardiology Reports, vol. 20, no. 11, p. 120, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Morrone and V. Morrone, “Acute pulmonary embolism: focus on the clinical picture,” Korean Circulation Journal, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 365–381, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Brieger, K. A. Eagle, S. G. Goodman et al., “Acute coronary syndromes without chest pain, an underdiagnosed and undertreated high-risk group: insights from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events,” Chest, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 461–469, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Fujino, M. Ishihara, H. Ogawa et al., “Impact of symptom presentation on in-hospital outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction,” Journal of Cardiology, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 29–34, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Puymirat, N. Aissaoui, L. Bonello et al., “Clinical outcomes according to symptom presentation in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the FAST-MI 2010 registry,” Clinical Cardiology, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 1256–1263, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. J. Rubin, “Cor pulmonale revisited. From ferrer and harvey to the present,” Annals of the American Thoracic Society, vol. 15, no. Supplement_1, pp. S42–S44, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Safwenberg, A. Terént, and L. Lind, “The Emergency Department presenting complaint as predictor of in-hospital fatality,” European Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 324–331, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Mahler, R. F. Riley, B. C. Hiestand et al., “The HEART pathway randomized trial: identifying emergency department patients with acute chest pain for early discharge,” Circulation: Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 195–203, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Than, D. Flaws, S. Sanders et al., “Development and validation of the emergency department assessment of chest pain score and 2 h accelerated diagnostic protocol,” Emergency Medicine Australasia, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 34–44, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. R. Pesola and H. Ahsan, “Dyspnea as an independent predictor of mortality,” The Clinical Respiratory Journal, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 142–152, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Abidov, A. Rozanski, R. Hachamovitch et al., “Prognostic significance of dyspnea in patients referred for cardiac stress testing,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 353, no. 18, pp. 1889–1898, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. G. Hansen, A. Pottegard, A. Brandes et al., “New-onset atrial fibrillation among patients with infection in the emergency department: a multicenter cohort study of 1-year stroke risk,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 133, no. 3, pp. 352–359.e3, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Lindow, J. Wiiala, J. Lundager Forberg et al., “Optimal measuring point for ST deviation in chest pain patients with possible acute coronary syndrome,” Journal of Electrocardiology, vol. 58, pp. 165–170, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Predicare, “Rapid emergency triage and treatment system,” 2021, https://predicare.se/om-retts/.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Quan, B. Li, C. M. Couris et al., “Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 173, no. 6, pp. 676–682, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Laribi, G. Keijzers, O. van Meer et al., “Epidemiology of patients presenting with dyspnea to emergency departments in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region,” European Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 345–349, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Herlitz, L. Hjalte, B. W. Karlson, B. O. Suserud, and T. Karlsson, “Characteristics and outcome of patients with acute chest pain in relation to the use of ambulances in an urban and a rural area,” The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 775–781, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Kohn, E. Kwan, M. Gupta, and J. A. Tabas, “Prevalence of acute myocardial infarction and other serious diagnoses in patients presenting to an urban emergency department with chest pain,” Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 383–390, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. K. Pedersen, C. Stengaard, K. Friesgaard et al., “Chest pain in the ambulance; prevalence, causes and outcome - a retrospective cohort study,” Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, vol. 27, no. 1, p. 84, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Karamercan, Z. D. Dundar, M. Ergin et al., “Seasonal variations of patients presenting dyspnea to emergency departments in Europe: results from the EURODEM Study,” Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 1879–1886, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Ray, S. Birolleau, Y. Lefort et al., “Acute respiratory failure in the elderly: etiology, emergency diagnosis and prognosis,” Critical Care, vol. 10, no. 3, Article ID R82, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Z. Pong, A. F. W. Ho, T. X. Z. Tan et al., “ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with non-chest pain presentation at the Emergency Department: insights from the Singapore Myocardial Infarction Registry,” Internal and Emergency Medicine, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 989–997, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kuster, C. H. Nickel, M. A. Jenny, L. L. Blaschke, and R. Bingisser, “Combinations of symptoms in emergency presentations: prevalence and outcome,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 8, no. 3, Article ID 345, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Erik Jemt et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

322

Downloads

502

Citations