Research Article

Impact of Optimizing the Emergency Care Process on the Emergency Effect and Prognosis of Patients with Hepatic Encephalopathy

Table 1

Comparison of general data of the two groups.

InformationControl group (n = 32)Observation group (n = 34)t or χ2 value value

Gender (female, mean ± SD)10 (31.25)12 (35.29)0.1210.728
Age (years, mean ± SD)50.25 ± 10.1351.46 ± 9.770.4940.623
Occupation (n, %)Employee4 (12.50)5 (14.71)2.0400.844
Worker2 (6.25)2 (5.88)
Farmer1 (3.13)2 (5.88)
Self-employed0 (0.00)1 (2.94)
Retired15 (46.88)17 (50.00)
Unemployed10 (31.25)7 (20.59)
Geography (n, %)Urban24 (75.00)28 (82.35)0.5330.465
Rural8 (25.00)6 (17.65)
Etiology (n, %)Cirrhotic disease26 (81.25)27 (79.41)0.0350.851
Noncirrhotic disease6 (18.75)7 (20.59)
Causes (n, %)Infection15 (46.88)18 (52.94)0.2430.622
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding12 (37.50)11 (32.35)0.1920.661
Electrolyte disturbances13 (40.63)16 (47.06)0.2770.599
Diarrhea, constipation4 (12.50)5 (14.71)0.0680.794
Others2 (6.25)4 (11.76)0.6070.436
Smoking history (n, %)11 (34.38)14 (41.18)0.3240.569
Alcohol consumption history (n, %)12 (37.50)14 (41.18)0.0930.760
Underlying disease (n, %)Diabetes mellitus4 (12.50)6 (17.65)0.1380.933
Coronary heart disease1 (3.13)1 (2.94)
Hypertension4 (12.50)7 (20.59)