An Evidenced-Based Review of Emergency Target Blood Pressure Management for Acute Aortic Dissection

Table 2

Quality evaluation of five guides.

Literature	Standardized percentage of each field (%)						Overall rating 1 (points)	Overall rating 2 (points)	Number of ≥60% areas (pcs)	Number of ≤30% areas (pcs)	Recommended level
	Scope and purpose	Participant	Rigour of guideline designation	Clarity of guide designation	Applicability of the guidelines	Independence of guideline writing
Hiratzka	94.45	61.12	81.25	94.45	81.25	95.84	6	6	6	0	A
Erbel	86.12	52.75	66.67	86.12	66.67	91.67	4	5	4	0	B
Riambau	100.00	47.22	54.17	100.00	54.17	95.84	5	4	4	0	B
Chaikof	100.00	38.89	91.67	100.00	91.67	91.67	5	6	5	0	B
Ohle	83.34	86.11	77.08	83.34	77.08	95.84	6	6	6	0	A