Stimulated Reservoir Volume Characterization and Optimum Lateral Well Spacing Study of Two-Well Pad: Midland Basin Case Study

<table class="table-group" id="tab5"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="4"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_left">CAPEX/1-mile well</td><td class="align_center">LOE</td><td class="align_center">Pricing (flat)</td><td class="align_center">WI/NRI</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="4"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">$6.75MM</td><td class="align_center">Parsley 17 HZ LOE</td><td class="align_center">Oil: $50/bbl<br/>Gas: $3/mscf<br/>NGL: $20/bbl</td><td class="align_center">96.1%/72.3%</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="4"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

<div>Economic assumptions for the NPV10 calculation.</div>

Geofluids

tab5

Table 5

Table 5: Stimulated Reservoir Volume Characterization and Optimum Lateral Well Spacing Study of Two-Well Pad: Midland Basin Case Study 