Research Article

Study on the Development Height of Overburden Water-Flowing Fracture Zone of the Working Face

Table 1

Test results of physical and mechanical parameters.

Sample No.Rock nameUniaxial compressive strength (MPa)Average (MPa)Tensile strength (MPa)Average (MPa)Elastic modulus(GPa)Average (GPa)Bulk density (g/cm3)Average (g/cm3)

1No. 4 fine sandstone69.9169.789.479.256.658.292.562.54
2No. 6 fine sandstone65.338.558.602.58
3No. 8 fine sandstone69.079.218.012.55
4No. 10 fine sandstone71.269.557.882.56
5No. 12 siltstone73.639.9010.072.43
6No. 14 fine sandstone70.089.338.242.56
7No. 16 fine sandstone68.528.748.592.54

8No. 3 sandy mudstone28.5725.612.111.762.962.962.432.39
9No. 5 mudstone21.431.802.732.35
10No. 7 mudstone24.181.912.742.41
11No. 9 mudstone21.662.363.522.39
12No. 11 mudstone30.401.422.992.39
13No. 13 mudstone27.431.172.732.35
14No. 15 mudstone25.631.553.112.40
15No. 17 mudstone25.611.762.892.37

16No. 18 conglomerate55.7055.706.636.636.806.802.632.63