Research Article

Response Surface Method for Strength Analysis and Proportion Optimization of New Type Sealing Materials

Table 4

Response surface secondary model and ANOVA results.

Curing age (d)SourceSum of squaresdfMean square valueSignificance

3Model332.631423.7624.40<0.0001
A159.821159.82164.12<0.0001
B2.6312.632.700.1224
C4.2714.274.390.0549
D43.67143.6744.85<0.0001
AB4.1014.104.210.0593
AC4.8114.814.940.0432
AD10.67110.6710.960.0052
BC0.05810.0580.0600.8102
BD1.0611.061.090.3145
CD1.1611.161.190.2940
A24.6114.614.730.0473
B253.14153.1454.57<0.0001
C27.0717.077.260.0174
D216.88116.8817.330.0010
Residual13.63140.97
Lack of fit13.63101.36
Pure error0.00040.000
Cor total346.2628
Adj value [-∞, 0.0001]; value [0.0001, 0.05]; value [0.05, +∞]
7Model328.941423.5014.33<0.0001
A139.621139.6285.15<0.0001
B5.8115.813.550.0807
C7.4317.434.530.0515
D70.35170.3542.91<0.0001
AB1.3411.340.810.3819
AC1.5511.550.940.3482
AD9.4519.455.760.0308
BC10.9413
BD0.2310.230.140.7128
CD0.2610.260.160.6981
A213.54113.548.260.0123
B225.25125.2515.400.0015
C222.23122.2313.560.0025
D222.18122.1813.530.0025
Residual22.96141.64
Lack of fit22.96102.30
Pure error0.00040.000
Cor Total351.9028
Adj value [-∞, 0.0001]; value [0.0001, 0.05]; value [0.05, +∞]