Research Article
Temperature Field of Artificially Frozen Gravel Formation and Optimization of Freezing Pipe Layout Parameters under Seepage Flow
Table 3
Differences between results from the numerical and physical model.
| Frozen wall | Seepage flow rate | 0 m/d | 0.25 (1.25) m/d | 0.50 (2.50) m/d | 0.75 (3.75) m/d | 1.00 (5.00) m/d |
| Merged time (%) | 0.81 | 2.50 | 3.24 | 7.84 | 16.75 | Upstream thickness (%) | 0.32 | 9.68 | 8.96 | 11.20 | 15.21 | Downstream thickness (%) | 0.27 | 5.76 | 4.12 | 23.12 | 26.58 | Total thickness (%) | 0.30 | 7.69 | 6.62 | 18.69 | 21.36 |
|
|