Research Article
A Laboratory Approach Considering Salinity to Investigate Archie’s Parameters in Deep Shale: A Case Study in Longmaxi Formation, Southern Sichuan
Table 3
Comparative analysis results of Archie’s parameters in different rocks [
1,
3,
7,
26,
37,
49–
59].
| Lithology | | | Porosity |
| Sandstone | Pure sandstone (in Archie) | 1 | 2 | 10~55% | Unconsolidated sandstone | 0.6 | 1.3 | Weak-cemented sandstone | 0.7 | 1.9 | Medium-cemented sandstone | 0.5 | 2.2 | Sandstone | | 1.6-2.3 | Shaly sandstone | <1.5 | 2.28 | Carbonate rock | Unconsolidated Shell limestone and dolomite | 0.55 | 1.85 | Medium-tight coarse crystalline limestone and dolomite | 0.6 | 2.5 | Tight fine crystalline limestone and dolomite | 0.8 | 2.3 | Carbonate rock | 1 | 2.5-5/2.3-3.0 | Shale | Shale (relatively low values) | \ | Gas shale reservoirs: 1.6-1.7 Oil shale reservoirs: <2 | \ | Cauvery basin: 1.31-1.86 | 10%~33% | Laboratory experiment: 1.6 | 9.7%~20.1% | Shale (relatively high values) | \ | Canning Basin: 2.9–3.6 (different salinity); 2.70 (reservoir stress) | 7.9%~8.5% | Eagle Ford: 2.2 | 2.1% | Shale (in our paper) | 1.47 | LZ area: 1.26 | 1.0%~6.2% |
|
|