Conventional Mercury Penetration and Constant Velocity Mercury Penetration Experiments Are Used to Quantitatively Characterize the Difference in Micropore Structure in Low Permeability Reservoirs and Its Influence on Movable Fluid Saturation

<div>Typical photos of C 6 and C 7 formations. (a) Intergranular pore, chlorite, well X 28, C 6. (b) Intergranular pore, ferrocalcite, well X 39, C 6. (c) Chlorite, intergranular pore, well X 13, C 6. (d) Very fine-grained arkose, well D 6266, C 7. (e) Feldspar dissolution, well D 1978, C 7. (f) Yimeng mixed layer, well D 6547, C 7.</div>

Geofluids

fig2

Figure 2

Figure 2: Conventional Mercury Penetration and Constant Velocity Mercury Penetration Experiments Are Used to Quantitatively Characterize the Difference in Micropore Structure in Low Permeability Reservoirs and Its Influence on Movable Fluid Saturation 

Figure 2 | Conventional Mercury Penetration and Constant Velocity Mercury Penetration Experiments Are Used to Quantitatively Characterize the Difference in Micropore Structure in Low Permeability Reservoirs and Its Influence on Movable Fluid Saturation 