Conventional Mercury Penetration and Constant Velocity Mercury Penetration Experiments Are Used to Quantitatively Characterize the Difference in Micropore Structure in Low Permeability Reservoirs and Its Influence on Movable Fluid Saturation

<table class="figure-group"><tr class="fig-image" id="a"><td><object data="https://static-preview.hindawi.com/articles/geofluids/volume-2023/2132017/figures/2132017.fig.004a.svgz" name="2132017.fig.004a" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(a) </b>Static</td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="b"><td><object data="https://static-preview.hindawi.com/articles/geofluids/volume-2023/2132017/figures/2132017.fig.004b.svgz" name="2132017.fig.004b" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(b) </b>Dynamic</td></tr></table>

<div>Schematic diagram of dynamic and static capillary pressure.</div>

Geofluids

fig4

Figure 4

Figure 4: Conventional Mercury Penetration and Constant Velocity Mercury Penetration Experiments Are Used to Quantitatively Characterize the Difference in Micropore Structure in Low Permeability Reservoirs and Its Influence on Movable Fluid Saturation 

Figure 4 | Conventional Mercury Penetration and Constant Velocity Mercury Penetration Experiments Are Used to Quantitatively Characterize the Difference in Micropore Structure in Low Permeability Reservoirs and Its Influence on Movable Fluid Saturation 