Numerical Simulations of Carbon Dioxide Storage Efficiency in Heterogeneous Reservoir Models

Table 1

Formation and CO₂BRA sample names corresponding to similar lithology and depositional environments and CO₂BRA sample porosity, permeability (mD), and parameters of relative permeability curves.

	Formation name	Lithology	Depositional environment	CO2BRA sample name	Sample porosity	Sample perm. (mD)
1	Lower Mt. Simon	Sandstone	Marginal marine	Bandera Brown A	0.164	124	0.566	1.00	0.00	0.320
2	Cranfield	Sandstone	Deltaic complex fluvial	Castlegate	0.252	865	0.705	1.00	0.00	0.185
3	Broom Creek	Sandstone	Aeolian	Navajo	0.156	41	0.497	1.00	0.00	0.271
4	Middle Duperow	Carbonate, limestone	Shallow marine	Edwards Yellow	0.192	25	0.460	1.00	0.01	0.102
5	Bass Island	Carbonate, dolomite	Shallow marine/reef	Silurian	0.129	327	0.453	1.00	0.10	0.032

Where and are the residual water and scCO₂ saturations and and are the maximum brine and scCO₂ relative permeability values.