Feasibility of Tunnel TEM Advanced Prediction: A 3D Forward Modeling Study

<div>(a) <svg height="9.34337pt" id="M103" style="vertical-align:-3.382461pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -5.96091 10.2343 9.34337" width="10.2343pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M387 375C387 402 357 448 257 448C172 448 82 404 82 326C82 289 108 255 156 241V239C85 223 23 181 23 116C23 39 89 -12 182 -12C265 -12 336 31 378 91L361 114C320 73 269 47 216 47C157 47 115 82 115 137C115 191 160 219 218 219C243 219 262 218 272 217L304 259L302 266C295 265 281 264 255 264C195 264 163 294 163 335C163 377 200 416 249 416C293 416 321 389 329 342C331 332 335 329 341 329C355 329 387 352 387 375Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,5.005,3.132)"><path d="M481 445L456 468C426 437 403 427 388 427C372 427 356 428 302 438C256 447 221 451 187 451C159 451 130 428 105 384C93 363 80 340 65 305L96 290C122 342 149 381 193 381C216 381 267 377 294 374S346 372 365 376L75 105C37 70 24 35 24 16C24 2 30 -5 35 -8C42 -8 46 -6 48 -2C58 14 75 35 90 41C102 46 116 46 147 32C200 8 267 -21 298 -21C347 -21 390 12 448 126L420 151C369 77 338 56 311 56C287 56 249 68 212 81C180 92 149 100 127 98C212 172 353 308 413 372L481 445Z"></path></g></svg> response of the single-TX device. (b) Percentage relative difference of the <svg height="9.34337pt" id="M104" style="vertical-align:-3.382461pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -5.96091 10.2343 9.34337" width="10.2343pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M387 375C387 402 357 448 257 448C172 448 82 404 82 326C82 289 108 255 156 241V239C85 223 23 181 23 116C23 39 89 -12 182 -12C265 -12 336 31 378 91L361 114C320 73 269 47 216 47C157 47 115 82 115 137C115 191 160 219 218 219C243 219 262 218 272 217L304 259L302 266C295 265 281 264 255 264C195 264 163 294 163 335C163 377 200 416 249 416C293 416 321 389 329 342C331 332 335 329 341 329C355 329 387 352 387 375Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,5.005,3.132)"><path d="M481 445L456 468C426 437 403 427 388 427C372 427 356 428 302 438C256 447 221 451 187 451C159 451 130 428 105 384C93 363 80 340 65 305L96 290C122 342 149 381 193 381C216 381 267 377 294 374S346 372 365 376L75 105C37 70 24 35 24 16C24 2 30 -5 35 -8C42 -8 46 -6 48 -2C58 14 75 35 90 41C102 46 116 46 147 32C200 8 267 -21 298 -21C347 -21 390 12 448 126L420 151C369 77 338 56 311 56C287 56 249 68 212 81C180 92 149 100 127 98C212 172 353 308 413 372L481 445Z"></path></g></svg> response between models with and without the low-resistivity anomaly at <span class="nowrap"><svg height="8.55521pt" id="M105" style="vertical-align:-0.2063904pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.34882 47.7062 8.55521" width="47.7062pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M536 404C536 423 520 448 491 448C445 448 398 404 308 283L286 338C255 416 242 448 217 448C182 448 138 402 92 341L111 321C149 368 169 378 178 378C188 378 198 363 214 320L254 212C185 117 138 65 107 65C98 65 85 69 82 75C79 82 73 86 65 86C44 86 23 60 23 39C23 7 44 -12 71 -12C119 -12 168 33 265 177L306 61C321 17 347 -12 373 -12C413 -12 465 33 507 96L491 119C459 84 432 60 413 60C395 60 378 92 358 148L321 250C341 279 369 310 389 332C417 363 439 382 456 382C466 382 475 376 481 368C486 361 492 358 496 358C513 358 536 381 536 404Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,10.899,0)"><path d="M535 323V373H52V323H535ZM535 138V188H52V138H535Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,22.162,0)"><path d="M384 0V27C293 34 287 42 287 114V635C232 613 172 594 109 583V559L157 557C201 555 205 550 205 499V114C205 42 199 34 109 27V0H384Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,28.402,0)"><path d="M241 635C89 635 35 457 35 312C35 153 89 -12 240 -12C390 -12 443 166 443 312C443 466 390 635 241 635ZM238 602C329 602 354 454 354 312C354 172 330 22 240 22C152 22 124 173 124 313S148 602 238 602Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,36.817,0)"><path d="M797 0V26C739 32 732 36 732 103V296C732 394 682 449 605 449C576 449 550 437 529 423C504 407 475 389 446 366C425 418 382 449 334 449C303 449 279 437 253 421C222 403 201 385 180 371V452C135 432 85 419 41 411V388C99 379 102 374 102 310V103C102 38 93 32 27 26V0H238V26C189 32 180 38 180 103V338C210 363 250 390 289 390C351 390 377 348 377 275V103C377 37 368 32 306 26V0H520V26C465 32 456 38 456 101V296C456 314 455 326 453 338C491 369 529 390 565 390C628 390 653 345 653 274V107C653 36 642 32 583 26V0H797Z"></path></g></svg>,</span> 20 m.</div>

Geofluids

fig7

Figure 7

Figure 7: Feasibility of Tunnel TEM Advanced Prediction: A 3D Forward Modeling Study 