Review Article

Postoperative Complications of Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer in a Meta-Analysis of High-Quality Case-Controlled Studies

Table 2

Summary of the studies in this meta-analysis.

AuthorPublished yearDuration of studyNTumor
status
Extent of LNDIncluding splenectomyType of reconstructionReported matching factor

Kim et al. [9]20082004–0660pT1–D1+/D2YesR-Y
Topal et al. [10]20082003–0660pStage I–D2YesR-Y
Kawamura et al. [11]20092003–0881cT1D2NoR-Y
Kim et al. [12]20112009–10190cT1D2-No.10NoR-Y
Siani et al. [13]20122003–0950pStage I–D1+/D2-No.10,11dNoR-Y
Bo et al. [14]20132004–10234pT2-D1+/D2-No.10,11dNoR-Y
Guan et al. [15]20132007–1097cT1-D2NoR-Y
Hong et al. [16]20132008–12204pStage I–IIID2NRNR
Kim et al. [17]20132011346cT1–3 N0-2D2-No.10NoR-Y
Kim et al. [18]20132002–10120pSatge I–D1+/D2NoR-Y
Lee et al. [19]20132003–10100pStage I–D1+NoR-Y
Shim et al. [20]20132009–1170NRD1+/D2NRR-Y
Lee et al. [21]20142006–0984cT1–D2-No.10,11dNoR-Y
Lee et al. [7]20152003–10753pTD1+NoR-Y
Ramagem et al. [22]20152009–13111pStage I–IIID2YesNR

LND, lymph node dissection; PSM, propensity score matching; R-Y; Roux-en-Y; NR, not reported.
Factors showing no significant statistical difference between LTG and OTG: 1, age; 2, gender; 3, body mass index; 4, comorbidity or American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status; 5, clinical or pathological TNM classification; 6, extent of lymphadenectomy; 7, type of reconstruction. Some studies did not show statistical differences in several factors.
on the 6th version of TNM classification. on the 7th version of TNM classification.