Research Article

Survival after Abdominoperineal and Sphincter-Preserving Resection in Nonmetastatic Rectal Cancer: A Population-Based Time-Trend and Propensity Score-Matched SEER Analysis

Table 3

Bias for abdominoperineal resection.

Logistic regression in raw data Patient characteristics after exact propensity score matching
OR (95% CI)Total
APR
CAA

Tumor stage (AJCC 6th ed.)
 Stage IReference<0.001295.2 (28.1%)194 (28.1%)101.2 (28.1%)
 Stage IIA1.21 (0.98–1.51)398.7 (38.0%)262 (38.0%)136.7 (38.0%)
 Stage IIB3.53 (1.91–7.31)1.5 (0.1%)1 (0.1%)0.5 (0.1%)
 Stage IIIA0.90 (0.65–1.25)36.5 (3.5%)24 (3.5%)12.5 (3.5%)
 Stage IIIB1.42 (1.12–1.80)261.7 (24.9%)172 (24.9%)89.7 (24.9%)
 Stage IIIC1.52 (1.14–2.04)56.3 (5.4%)37 (5.4%)19.3 (5.4%)

Retrieved regional lymph nodes
 <12Reference0.155503.7 (48.0%)331 (48.0%)172.7 (48.0%)
 12+0.89 (0.75–1.05)546.3 (52.0%)359 (52.0%)187.3 (52.0%)

Grading
 G1Reference0.07222.8 (2.2%)15 (2.2%)7.8 (2.2%)
 G21.22 (0.92–1.61)969.3 (92.3%)637 (92.3%)332.3 (92.3%)
 G3/41.34 (0.95–1.88)41.1 (3.9%)27 (3.9%)14.1 (3.9%)
 Unknown1.69 (1.12–2.57)16.7 (1.6%)11 (1.6%)5.7 (1.6%)

Radiation
 NoneReference<0.001228.3 (21.7%)150 (21.7%)78.3 (21.7%)
 Before surgery1.75 (1.43–2.13)768.5 (73.2%)505 (73.2%)263.5 (73.2%)
 After surgery1.58 (1.20–2.10)53.3 (5.1%)35 (5.1%)18.3 (5.1%)

Year
 2005Reference0.155176.5 (16.8%)116 (16.8%)60.5 (16.8%)
 20061.05 (0.79–1.41)152.2 (14.5%)100 (14.5%)52.2 (14.5%)
 20070.92 (0.69–1.23)149.1 (14.2%)98 (14.2%)51.1 (14.2%)
 20081.19 (0.88–1.62)94.3 (9.0%)62 (9.0%)32.3 (9.0%)
 20090.82 (0.62–1.09)172 (16.4%)113 (16.4%)59 (16.4%)
 20100.98 (0.73–1.31)172 (16.4%)113 (16.4%)59 (16.4%)
 20110.81 (0.61–1.08)133.9 (12.8%)88 (12.8%)45.9 (12.8%)

Age
 <50Reference<0.001132.4 (12.6%)87 (12.6%)45.4 (12.6%)
 50–641.20 (0.97–1.48)544.8 (51.9%)358 (51.9%)186.8 (51.9%)
 65–791.86 (1.48–2.33)343.9 (32.8%)226 (32.8%)117.9 (32.8%)
 80+2.76 (1.96–3.94)28.9 (2.8%)19 (2.8%)9.9 (2.8%)

Gender
 MaleReference0.066833.9 (79.4%)548 (79.4%)285.9 (79.4%)
 Female0.86 (0.73–1.01)216.1 (20.6%)142 (20.6%)74.1 (20.6%)

Ethnicity
 CaucasianReference0.0081033.3 (98.4%)679 (98.4%)354.3 (98.4%)
 African-American0.71 (0.55–0.94)7.6 (0.7%)5 (0.7%)2.6 (0.7%)
 Other/unknown1.30 (0.97–1.77)9.1 (0.9%)6 (0.9%)3.1 (0.9%)

Marital status
 MarriedReference0.006897.8 (85.5%)590 (85.5%)307.8 (85.5%)
 Single/widowed1.29 (1.06–1.58)106.5 (10.1%)70 (10.1%)36.5 (10.1%)
 Other/unknown1.33 (1.06–1.69)45.7 (4.3%)30 (4.3%)15.7 (4.3%)

After exclusion of 3,650 patients for the exact propensity score matching, no bias was observed in the remaining 1,050 patients for APR versus CAA (all ).
logistic regression with the odds ratio (OR) for APR in the original raw data set ().
ratio tests.
for comparison of APR versus CAA in weighted Chi-square tests after exact weighted propensity score matching ().
Weighted matching causes decimals for the number of patients in the group with CAA.