Research Article

A Randomized, Endoscopist-Blinded, Prospective Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Patient Tolerability between Bowel Preparation Protocols Using Sodium Picosulfate Magnesium Citrate and Polyethylene-Glycol (1 L and 2 L) for Colonoscopy

Table 4

Comparison between groups: final diagnosis of patients undergone colonoscopy.

Final diagnosisPreparation value
Group AGroup BGroup C

1. Normal44 (44.4%)35 (35.4%)46 (47.4%)0.203
2. Colon adenoma/cancer45 (45.5%)48 (48.5%)36 (37.1%)0.252
3. Irritable bowel syndrome13 (11.0%)18 (16.8%)11 (9.9%)0.351
4. Colonic diverticula9 (7.6%)7 (6.5%)4 (3.6%)0.371
5. GI hemorrhage4 (3.4%)6 (5.6%)1 (0.9%)0.170
6. Hemorrhoids6 (5.1%)2 (1.9%)5 (4.5%)0.350
7. Colitis6 (5.1%)4 (3.7%)5 (4.5%)0.810
8. Newly diagnosed IBD (UC/CD)1 (0.8%)1 (0.9%)3 (2.7%)0.436
9. Known IBD (UC/CD)0 (0.0%)1 (0.9%)3 (2.7%)0.166
10. Others5 (4.2%)4 (3.7%)6 (5.4%)0.801

1. Normal: includes small hyperplastic polyps approved by pathology; 10. Others: includes gastrointestinal tract lymphoma, melanosis coli, cholecystitis and pancreatic neoplasm, gastric adenoma, or malignancy. Multiple diagnoses per person were possible. GI: gastrointestinal; IBD: inflammatory bowel disease; UC: ulcerative colitis; CD: Crohn’s disease.