Review Article

Diagnostic Ability of Magnifying Narrow-Band Imaging for the Extent of Early Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 1

Characteristics of the ten included articles.

StudyCountryStudy typeNo. of patientsSex, male/femaleNo. of lesionsAge, or range (years)Diagnostic standardMacroscopic type (elevated/flat/depressed)Tumor size, or range (mm)Location (upper third/middle third/lower third)Histological type (differentiated/undifferentiated)Depth of invasion (T1a/T1b and deeper)H. pylori status (noneradication/uninfected/eradication/unknown)Endoscopists’ experience (experienceda/less experiencedb)No. of positive resection of horizontal margin

Yoshimizu et al. [14]JapanRetrospective12774/5312756 (26-80)Four or more circumferential biopsies approximately 5 mm apart from the estimated lesion border were obtained to confirm noncancerous areas7/26/9412 (1-29)1/86/400/127119/8NANA3
Horii et al. [17]JapanRetrospective330251/79330NAAt least 4 biopsies were taken from noncancerous tissues approximately 5 mm outside the EGC lesion146/184 (flat+depressed)<20 (268 people)
>20 (62 people)
58/272 (middle+lower)NANA212/2/116/0330/07
Horiuchi et al. [16]JapanRetrospective8146/3581NABoth the utmost oral and utmost anal sites marked in ME-NBI were consistent with the results of postoperative pathological examination0/13/68≤206/35/400/8172/933/21/27/081/01
Nagahama et al. [15]JapanProspective175118/57175Biopsies were taken from noncancerous and cancerous mucosa, each at 5 mm from the margin on the oral-most side36/9/13035/86/54142/33138/3796/NA/NA/2144/310
Horiguchi et al. [9]JapanProspective3023/73667.5 (57–83)A complete match of the histological and endoscopic horizontal extents at all four circumferential quadrant points (oral, anal, anterior, and posterior sites) around the cancerous lesion7/0/29 ()4/13/1934/230/60/0/36/0NANA
Asada-Hirayama et al. [12]JapanProspective10373/30109 (accurate evaluation)/ (inaccurate evaluation)The marking dots (oral or anal edge of the tumor) were located within 1 mm of the pathological tumor border44/69 (accurate evaluation)/ (inaccurate evaluation)18/55/36105/484/2542/30/24/7NANA
Horiuchi et al. [13]JapanProspective7645/3176 (accurately diagnosed)/ (misdiagnosed)Both the utmost oral and anal sites were consistent with the postoperative pathological examinationNA (accurately diagnosed)/ (misdiagnosed)6/32/380/7667/9NA76/017
Nonaka et al. [10]JapanNA3125/63171 (57-87)Biopsies were taken from noncancerous and cancerous mucosa, each at 1.8 mm from the margin on the orifice and anal sides of each lesion0/7/2422 (3-72)8/15/831/0NANANANA
Okada et al. [11]JapanProspective1812/618The distance between an APC representing the oral and/or anal borders of the tumor and the pathological lateral extent of cancer was within 1 mm0/11/7 (1–20)4/9/50/1816/2NANA0
Kiyotoki et al. [18]JapanNANANA31NAThe distance between the marking dots (one or two marking dots on the tumor margin) and the tumor margin was less than 1 mmNANANANANANANANA

T1a: mucosal cancer; T1b: submucosal cancer; EGC: early gastric cancer; ME-NBI: magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging; APC: argon plasma coagulator; NA: not available. aExperienced means >5 years of endoscopy experience. bLess experienced means <5 years of endoscopy experience.