Research Article
Comparison of Gastric Cancer Risk Classifications Using Conventional and New Pepsinogen Criteria
Table 2
Comparison of gastric cancer risk classification results between the conventional and new PG criteria in combination with H. pylori antibody.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
†If serum H. pylori antibody titer was ≥2.3 EV, it was defined as antibody-positive. If the PG values satisfied the criteria, it was defined as PG-positive. When both antibody and PG were negative, it was defined as low risk. In all other cases, it was defined as high risk. ‡Bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals from 10,000 re-samplings when the new PG cutoff values were applied. PG, pepsinogen; H. pylori, Helicobacter pylori; EV, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay value; CI, confidence interval; GC, gastric cancer. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||