Moving beyond an Addiction Framework for Phubbing: Unraveling the Influence of Intrinsic Motivation, Boredom, and Online Vigilance

Table 4

Bivariate correlation of phubbing measures with intrinsic motivation, online vigilance, and boredom.

Variables	I.M.	OV: Sal.	OV: React	OV: Mon.	MSBS: Dis.	MSBS: H.A.	MSBS: In.	MSBS: L.A.	MSBS: T.P.
Franchina	0.38	0.41	0.43	0.45	0.16	0.16	0.18	0.15	0.17
Karadag total	0.40	0.53	0.54	0.51	0.32	0.36	0.39	0.30	0.24
Communication disturbance	0.41	0.51	0.47	0.47	0.27	0.28	0.33	0.23	0.20
Phone obsession	0.31	0.42	0.48	0.42	0.30	0.35	0.35	0.30	0.22
Grieve and March	0.33	0.44	0.55	0.49	0.23	0.26	0.27	0.19	0.17
GSP-nomophobia	0.37	0.45	0.54	0.47	0.24	0.30	0.30	0.24	0.18
GSP-interpersonal conflict	0.32	0.48	0.44	0.46	0.20	0.22	0.23	0.19	0.17
GSP-self-isolation	0.35	0.47	0.40	0.46	0.27	0.29	0.27	0.29	0.23
GSP-problem acknowledgment	0.32	0.49	0.49	0.48	0.41	0.37	0.44	0.34	0.28
GSP-total	0.44	0.60	0.60	0.59	0.35	0.38	0.40	0.33	0.27

Note: I. M. = intrinsic motivation; OV = online vigilance; Sal. = salience; React = reactibility; Mon = monitoring; MSBS = multidimensional state boredom scale; Dis. = disengagement; H.A. = high arousal; In. = inattention; L.A. = low arousal; T.P. = time perception; ; ; .