DWB: ; WB (general): ; referral to DWB de facto tools and initiatives (i.e., Google DWB or others): ; Google’s commitment statement of DWB:
Papers with scales for DWB
Papers with framework for DWB
Sample size
6-415769
Mean age Age range
29.32 (10-65)
Gender
45% female
DWB outcome (parameters and concepts to measure or study)
Related to users: Users’ characteristics, feelings, and moods: Digital literacy and competency: Awareness of WB theories and components: Digital addiction (& problematic usage): Mental wellbeing: Life satisfaction: Procrastination: Screen time: Sense of agency: FoMO reduction and classification: Needs satisfaction: Work-life-balance: Burnout: Mindful scrolling: No of keystroke and scrolls: Sense of coherence (self-control, meaningfulness, mindfulness):
Related to design: Usability, effectiveness, and acceptance (of a tool or training): Ethical risks (i.e. loss of autonomy or lack of transparency): Regretful usage (caused by design features): Others DWB as a parameter impacted by social, cultural, and political complexity:
Underlying theory categories
BC: ; SWB: ; ED: ; DL:
Key: UK = United Kingdom; USA = United States of America; KSA = Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; UAE = United Arab Emirates; BC = behavioural change; WB = wellbeing; SWB = subjective wellbeing; ED = ethical design; DL = digital literacy. value does not add up to 87 as some studies include more than one outcome.
