|
| Appeared in: | Scale | Type | Description | Validity |
|
[87] Craven et al. (2019)
[88] Gui et al. (2017) | WHO-5 well-being index [89] | Survey | Describing feelings within a specific period of time (i.e., 2 weeks). Measured on a Likert scale of 0 to 5
Sample statement: (1) I have felt cheerful and in good spirits; (2) I have felt calm and relaxed | Validated |
|
[87] Craven et al. (2019)
[59] Rich et al., 2020 | Warwick–Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS) [90] | Survey | Evaluating affective-emotional aspects, cognitive evaluative dimensions, and psychological functioning (including satisfaction, autonomy, competence, and relatedness)-in 14 statements on a 5-Likert scale 1-5
Sample statements: (1) I’ve been feeling optimistic about the future; (2) I’ve been feeling useful; (3) I’ve been dealing with problems well. | Validated |
|
[65] Harrington et al. (2015)
[91] Docherty and Biega (2022) | Satisfaction with life scale (SWLS) [92] | Survey | Cognitive evaluation of satisfaction of life on 7 points Likert scale
Sample statements: (1) in most ways my life is close to my ideal. (2) the conditions of my life are excellent. (3) if I could live my life over, I would change almost nothing | Validated |
|
| [62] Joubert et al. (2020) | Human well-being index [93] | Indicators | Built on five categories of wellbeing: Health and population, wealth, knowledge and culture, community, and equity.
Indicators may include how long people are expected to life with good health, how well needs are met for different incomes, enrolment in different levels of education, political rights and press freedom, household and gender equity in income shares and decision making | Validated |
|
| [45] Martzoukou et al. (2021) | Digital Wellbeing 6 items | Survey | DWB represents one of the digital competences and is measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1-novice, 5-expert). Consists of 6 survey items.
Sample items: (1) “feeling comfortable, in control, and safe when using digital technologies”; (2) “recognising that digital information and media can cause distraction, overload and stress, and disconnecting when necessary”; (3) “considering the rights and wrongs and the possible consequences of your online behaviour” | — |
|
| [65] Harrington et al. (2015) | Zarit et al.’s burden (for dementia carers WB) [94] | Interview questions | Interview to assess the well-being of the carer of people with dementia and how well they are coping in their role.
An example of the questions asked: “do you wish you could leave the care of this person to someone else?” with a slide scale of never, sometimes, and nearly always. | Validated |
|
| [65] Harrington et al. (2015) | Quality of life in late-stage dementia’ QUALID- [95] | Questionnaire | Caregiver acts as a proxy rater and answers questions relating to care recipient’s behaviour and mood
Through activity and affect approach, the proxy rates the frequency of certain behaviors and moods exhibited by their care recipient | Validated |
|
| [65] Harrington et al. (2015) | Bath assessment of subjective quality of life in dementia’ BASQID [96] | Questionnaire | Direct assessment for the quality of life as per the evaluation of the person’s with dementia (themselves) on a 5-likert scale of: Not at all satisfied, a little satisfied, satisfied, very satisfied, and extremely satisfied
Sample question: “how satisfied are you with your level of energy?” | Validated |
|
| [65] Harrington et al. (2015) | Dementia care mapping (DCM) assesses well-being and quality of life [97] | Observational analysis | A structured observational analysis. An assessor uses a six-point ordinal response format which ranges over twenty-four activity categories | Validated |
|
