Exploration of an On-Site Pharmacist Intervention within Australian Residential Aged Care Facilities Using Normalisation Process Theory: A Mixed-Methods Study

Table 2

Semistructured interview participant details.

Participant groups	Number of participants	Age (years) range and mean ± SD	Gender
Resident (R)	10	≤85 (5, 50%); >85 (5, 50%); 83.5 ± 7.17	F (7, 70%); M (3, 30%)
Family member (FM)	4	≤70 (2, 50%); >70 (2, 50%); 89.5 ± 6.81	F (3, 75%); M (1, 25%)
On-site pharmacist (OSP)	6	≤40 (4, 67%); >40 (2, 33%)^†; 37.7 ± 5.99	F (5, 83%); M (1, 17%)^†
RACF manager (M)	7	≤50 (2, 25%); >50 (6, 75%)^‡; 51.6 ± 9.11	F (6, 75%); M (2, 25%)^‡
Nursing staff (RN or EN)	10	≤40 (5, 50%); >40 (5, 50%); 43.1 ± 17.61	F (10, 100%)
Prescriber (GP or NP)	9	≤40 (1, 12.5%); >40 (7, 87.5%)^§; 51.6 ± 10.66	F (4, 50%); M (4, 50%)^§

^†7 interviews were conducted with 6 OSPs; one OSP worked across two RACFs and was therefore interviewed twice. ^‡Includes characteristics of RACF manager who in lieu of an interview provided written feedback. ^§Does not include characteristics of GP who was interviewed but elected not to disclose their characteristics.