When More Satisfying and Supportive Relationships Increase Loneliness: The Social Worlds of People with Lived Experience of Homelessness

Table 1

Univariate analyses of family, social, or romantic loneliness with social support subscales and network-specific rated importance and rated satisfaction scores.

	Family Loneliness	Social Loneliness	Romantic Loneliness
Social support subtypes
Emotional Information	F (1, 125) =	F (1, 125) =	F (1, 125) =
Affectionate	F (1, 126) =	F (1, 127) = 2.77	F (1, 126) =
Positive social interaction	F (1, 126) =	F (1, 127) =	F (1, 126) =
Tangible	F (1, 126) =	F (1, 127) =	F (1, 126) =
Overall support	F (1, 125) =	F (1, 125) =	F (1, 125) =
Rated network importance
Current friends	F (1, 125) = 0.26	F(1, 126) =	F (1, 125) =
Family	F (1, 125) =	F (1, 126) =	F (1, 125) = 0.01
Old friends	F (1, 125) = 0.00	F (1, 126) =	F (1, 125) =
Intimate partner	F (1, 125) =	F (1, 126) = 0.22	F (1, 125) =
Service providers	F (1, 125) =	F (1, 126) =	F (1, 125) =
Rated satisfaction with network
Current friends	F (1, 125) =	F (1, 126) =	F (1, 125) = 0.06
Family	F (1, 126) =	F (1, 127) = 0.01	F (1, 126) = 0.0
Old friends	F (1, 126) =	F (1, 127) = 1.54	F (1, 126) = 2.25
Intimate partners	F (1, 125) =	F (1, 126) =	F (1, 125) =
Service providers	F (1, 125) = 0.01	F (1, 127) = 0.02	F (1, 126) =
Pet(s) ownership	F (1, 126) =	F (1, 127) = 0.03	F (1, 126) =