When More Satisfying and Supportive Relationships Increase Loneliness: The Social Worlds of People with Lived Experience of Homelessness

Table 3

Hierarchical regression analyses of social support and social network variables regressed onto social loneliness.

	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3
Intercept	3.18	2.68	2.90
Social support
Emo/Info	−0.07 [−0.29, 0.14]	−0.05 [−0.26, 0.16]	−0.04 [−0.25, 0.17]
Pos. interaction	0.30 [0.12,	0.20 [0.01,	0.18 [−0.01, 0.38]
Tangible	0.07 [−0.10, 0.24]	0.10 [−0.07, 0.27]	0.09 [−0.08, 0.26]
Network variables
Old friend importance		1.33	1.06 [−0.183, 2.32]
Current friend importance		1.91 [0.44,	1.78 [0.30,
Satisfaction		0.02 [−0.12, 0.17]	0.03 [−0.11, 0.18]
Service provider satisfaction			−0.66 [−1.7, 0.37]
Intimate partner satisfaction			−0.01 [−0.10, 0.11]
Model statistics	F (3, 121) = 6.52,	F (7, 117) = 5.25,	F (8, 116) = 4.52,
Adjusted R^2	0.12	0.19	0.19

^∗Confidence interval does not include zero.