Research Article

Analysis of the Game Behavior of Smart Community Regulatory Participants to Co-Create the Smart City: Post-Human Stakeholder Perspectives

Table 1

Parameter symbols and significance.

ParameterSignificance

PxThe public gains made when the government actively regulates Px > Rx
RxPublic welfare loss when the government supervises loosely
Cx1The cost of regulation paid for when the government actively regulates it (Cx1 > Cx2)
Cx2The cost of regulation incurred when the government regulates it loosely
Py1Normal income from the operation of smart community
Py2When the government strictly supervises, it gives smart community self-discipline management rewards (Py2 > Py3)
Py3Additional credit benefits derived from the self-management of smart community
Py4Additional benefits earned when smart community is not disciplined
Cy1The cost of the smart community in self-regulation
Cy2The cost of smart community paying when they are not disciplined
Cy3Additional costs incurred when smart community is not self-disciplined (including rent-seeking costs)
Cy4Punishment of smart community for not being self-disciplined when the government strictly supervises them (including penalties for rent-seeking activities)
Pz1Normal income of third parties
Pz2Third parties accept additional proceeds from rent-seeking
Pz3Rewards for refusing rent-seeking to third parties when governments actively regulate them
Cz1Cost of third-party supervision (assuming equal rent-seeking)
Cz2Third-party agencies accept rent-seeking penalties when the government strictly supervises them