Review Article
Involvement of Lay Assessors in the Inspection and Regulation of Public Services: A Systematic Review
Table 3
CASP evaluations of peer-reviewed studies.
| | Quality criteria | Baraitser et al. [20] | Adams et al. [10] | Adams et al. [22] | Boyd et al. [23] | Wiig et al. [25] | Hustler and Goodwin [26] | Brown, et al. [27] | O’Brien et al. [28] | Wright [32] | Weinstein [34] | Simmill-Binning et al. [35] | Unwin and Leverett [36] | Scourfield [38] | De Graaff et al. [42] | Richardson et al. [43] | Dolbear [45] |
| | Was there a clear statement of the aims of the research? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | | Is a qualitative methodology appropriate? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | | Was the research design appropriate to address the aims of the research? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | | Was the recruitment strategy appropriate to the aims of the research? | Y | Y | U | U | Y | Y | U | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | U | Y | Y | Y | | Was the data collected in a way that addressed the research issue? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | U | Y | Y | Y | | Has the relationship between the researcher and participants been adequately considered? | Y | U | Y | Y | U | U | U | U | Y | U | Y | Y | Y | Y | U | U | | Have ethical issues been taken into consideration? | Y | Y | U | Y | Y | Y | U | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | | Was the data analysis sufficiently rigorous? | Y | U | U | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | | Is there a clear statement of findings? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | | How valuable is the research? | V | V | V | V | V | V | V | V | V | V | V | V | V | V | V | V |
|
|
Y = yes, U = unclear, V = valuable.
|
