Organizational Factors Associated with Regulation Noncompliance in Home Care Services and Service Housing Facilities: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study
Table 3
Results of logistic regression models—variables explaining regulation noncompliance in service housing facilities.
Model 1a
Model 2b
B
S.E
Wald
df
Odds ratio
95% C.I for odds ratio
B
S.E
Wald
df
Odds ratio
95% C.I for odds ratio
Lower
Upper
Lower
Upper
Clinical complexity of clients
0.703
1.426
0.243
1
0.622
2.020
0.124
33.031
−0.024
1.791
0.000
1
0.989
0.976
0.029
32.670
Number of clients
−0.006
0.017
0.140
1
0.708
0.994
0.961
1.027
−0.007
0.021
0.107
1
0.743
0.993
0.954
1.034
Indirect care time
0.002
0.003
0.286
1
0.593
1.002
0.995
1.008
0.001
0.004
0.021
1
0.885
1.001
0.992
1.009
Number of disruptions
0.110
0.047
5.531
1
0.019
1.116
1.019
1.224
0.022
0.055
0.157
1
0.692
1.022
0.917
1.139
Care time in relation to clinical complexity
−0.107
0.346
0.096
1
0.757
0.898
0.456
1.769
−0.387
0.437
0.783
1
0.376
0.679
0.288
1.600
Team autonomy
−0.891
0.341
6.814
1
0.009
0.410
0.210
0.801
−0.752
0.421
3.192
1
0.074
0.472
0.207
1.076
Private employer
−0.717
0.230
9.729
1
0.002
0.488
0.311
0.766
−0.492
0.276
3.184
1
0.074
0.611
0.356
1.050
Perceived lack of time
0.542
0.102
28.337
1
<0.001
1.719
1.408
2.099
Perceived lack of resources
0.812
0.103
61.734
1
<0.001
2.252
1.839
2.758
Constant
0.830
2.002
0.172
1
0.678
2.293
−1.179
2.535
0.493
1
0.483
0.169
aModel 1: Cox and Snell = 4.4% and Nagelkerke = 6.5%. bModel 2: Cox and Snell = 26.3% and Nagelkerke = 39.1%.