Application of the Flux-Variance Technique for Evapotranspiration Estimates in Three Types of Agricultural Structures

<div>Vertical distribution of the half-hourly friction velocity averaged during campaign S2. Horizontal lines represent the standard error. Canopy height is <span class="nowrap"><svg height="12.2578pt" id="M101" style="vertical-align:-3.29568pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.96212 35.1699 12.2578" width="35.1699pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M669 636L663 650H260C230 650 221 652 208 675H186C177 621 162 548 144 481L173 479C195 534 211 560 226 578C248 604 266 615 373 615H544C460 511 114 112 23 16L31 0H561C577 34 611 135 622 170L594 182C566 125 544 88 515 65C481 38 416 35 319 35C249 35 197 37 152 41C270 184 542 501 669 636Z" id="g113-91"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,8.931,3.132)"><path d="M416 501L399 642C356 655 314 665 271 665C140 665 63 582 63 486C63 372 163 325 229 290C304 250 359 217 359 142C359 70 316 25 240 25C138 25 94 125 78 186L44 178C52 123 64 45 72 21C81 16 96 8 121 0S179 -15 220 -15C353 -15 445 68 445 176C445 289 350 335 270 375C191 414 143 449 143 520C143 572 177 627 253 627C340 627 366 556 382 495L416 501Z" id="g58-81"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,17.482,0)"><path d="M535 323V373H52V323H535ZM535 138V188H52V138H535Z" id="g117-34"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,28.745,0)"><path d="M241 635C89 635 35 457 35 312C35 153 89 -12 240 -12C390 -12 443 166 443 312C443 466 390 635 241 635ZM238 602C329 602 354 454 354 312C354 172 330 22 240 22C152 22 124 173 124 313S148 602 238 602Z" id="g113-49"></path></g></svg>.</span> Screen height is <span class="nowrap"><svg height="12.2578pt" id="M102" style="vertical-align:-3.29568pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.96212 35.1699 12.2578" width="35.1699pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M669 636L663 650H260C230 650 221 652 208 675H186C177 621 162 548 144 481L173 479C195 534 211 560 226 578C248 604 266 615 373 615H544C460 511 114 112 23 16L31 0H561C577 34 611 135 622 170L594 182C566 125 544 88 515 65C481 38 416 35 319 35C249 35 197 37 152 41C270 184 542 501 669 636Z" id="g113-91"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,8.931,3.132)"><path d="M416 501L399 642C356 655 314 665 271 665C140 665 63 582 63 486C63 372 163 325 229 290C304 250 359 217 359 142C359 70 316 25 240 25C138 25 94 125 78 186L44 178C52 123 64 45 72 21C81 16 96 8 121 0S179 -15 220 -15C353 -15 445 68 445 176C445 289 350 335 270 375C191 414 143 449 143 520C143 572 177 627 253 627C340 627 366 556 382 495L416 501Z" id="g58-81"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,17.482,0)"><path d="M535 323V373H52V323H535ZM535 138V188H52V138H535Z" id="g117-34"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,28.745,0)"><path d="M384 0V27C293 34 287 42 287 114V635C232 613 172 594 109 583V559L157 557C201 555 205 550 205 499V114C205 42 199 34 109 27V0H384Z" id="g113-50"></path></g></svg>.</span></div>

International Journal of Agronomy

fig3

Figure 3

Figure 3: Application of the Flux-Variance Technique for Evapotranspiration Estimates in Three Types of Agricultural Structures 