Evaluation of <svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" style="vertical-align:-5.0608pt" id="M1" height="19.3125pt" version="1.1" viewBox="-0.0657574 -14.2517 34.1474 19.3125" width="34.1474pt"><g transform="matrix(.017,0,0,-0.017,0,0)"><path id="g190-79" d="M719 650H483V622C553 619 576 606 581 560C585 532 588 487 588 394V148H585L167 650H20V622C67 618 88 610 109 585C127 562 129 557 129 484V264C129 173 126 124 123 93C118 44 92 31 35 28V0H272V28C204 32 181 44 176 95C173 124 170 172 170 264V515H172L598 -9H629V394C629 487 631 532 635 563C639 606 663 619 719 622V650Z"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,0,0,-0.017,12.75,0)"><path id="g190-73" d="M729 650H468V622C546 615 554 610 554 527V365H213V527C213 610 221 616 297 622V650H38V622C120 616 128 611 128 527V123C128 39 120 34 40 28V0H303V28C221 34 213 40 213 123V322H554V123C554 39 546 34 460 28V0H728V28C647 34 639 39 639 123V527C639 610 647 615 729 622V650Z"/></g><g transform="matrix(.012,0,0,-0.012,25.992,-7.578)"><path id="g54-36" d="M556 236V289H337V504H275V289H56V236H275V-4H337V236H556Z"/></g><g transform="matrix(.012,0,0,-0.012,25.992,4.995)"><path id="g50-53" d="M462 177V227H365V632H320C217 496 116 350 21 208V177H284V109C284 43 280 38 190 31V0H451V31C369 38 365 43 365 108V177H462ZM284 227H88C155 336 218 430 282 519H284V227Z"/></g></svg> Adsorption Capacity in Water of Coffee Husk-Derived Biochar at Different Pyrolysis Temperatures

<div>Adsorption capacity <svg height="14.6307pt" id="M133" style="vertical-align:-3.834001pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -10.7967 25.8693 14.6307" width="25.8693pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M719 650H483V622C553 619 576 606 581 560C585 532 588 487 588 394V148H585L167 650H20V622C67 618 88 610 109 585C127 562 129 557 129 484V264C129 173 126 124 123 93C118 44 92 31 35 28V0H272V28C204 32 181 44 176 95C173 124 170 172 170 264V515H172L598 -9H629V394C629 487 631 532 635 563C639 606 663 619 719 622V650Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,9.659,0)"><path d="M729 650H468V622C546 615 554 610 554 527V365H213V527C213 610 221 616 297 622V650H38V622C120 616 128 611 128 527V123C128 39 120 34 40 28V0H303V28C221 34 213 40 213 123V322H554V123C554 39 546 34 460 28V0H728V28C647 34 639 39 639 123V527C639 610 647 615 729 622V650Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,19.691,-5.741)"><path d="M556 236V289H337V504H275V289H56V236H275V-4H337V236H556Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,19.691,3.784)"><path d="M462 177V227H365V632H320C217 496 116 350 21 208V177H284V109C284 43 280 38 190 31V0H451V31C369 38 365 43 365 108V177H462ZM284 227H88C155 336 218 430 282 519H284V227Z"></path></g></svg> (mg·g<sup>−1</sup>) vs .Co (mg·L<sup>−1</sup>) at different pyrolytic temperatures. Different letters represent statistically significant differences. (a) Biochar at 300°C, (b) biochar at 450°C, (c) biochar at 600°C, and (d) adsorption efficiency of 3 forms of biochar.</div>

International Journal of Agronomy

fig2

Figure 2

Figure 2: Evaluation of <svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" style="vertical-align:-5.0608pt" id="M1" height="19.3125pt" version="1.1" viewBox="-0.0657574 -14.2517 34.1474 19.3125" width="34.1474pt"><g transform="matrix(.017,0,0,-0.017,0,0)"><path id="g190-79" d="M719 650H483V622C553 619 576 606 581 560C585 532 588 487 588 394V148H585L167 650H20V622C67 618 88 610 109 585C127 562 129 557 129 484V264C129 173 126 124 123 93C118 44 92 31 35 28V0H272V28C204 32 181 44 176 95C173 124 170 172 170 264V515H172L598 -9H629V394C629 487 631 532 635 563C639 606 663 619 719 622V650Z"/></g><g transform="matrix(.017,0,0,-0.017,12.75,0)"><path id="g190-73" d="M729 650H468V622C546 615 554 610 554 527V365H213V527C213 610 221 616 297 622V650H38V622C120 616 128 611 128 527V123C128 39 120 34 40 28V0H303V28C221 34 213 40 213 123V322H554V123C554 39 546 34 460 28V0H728V28C647 34 639 39 639 123V527C639 610 647 615 729 622V650Z"/></g><g transform="matrix(.012,0,0,-0.012,25.992,-7.578)"><path id="g54-36" d="M556 236V289H337V504H275V289H56V236H275V-4H337V236H556Z"/></g><g transform="matrix(.012,0,0,-0.012,25.992,4.995)"><path id="g50-53" d="M462 177V227H365V632H320C217 496 116 350 21 208V177H284V109C284 43 280 38 190 31V0H451V31C369 38 365 43 365 108V177H462ZM284 227H88C155 336 218 430 282 519H284V227Z"/></g></svg> Adsorption Capacity in Water of Coffee Husk-Derived Biochar at Different Pyrolysis Temperatures 

International Journal of Agronomy

Evaluation of Adsorption Capacity in Water of Coffee Husk-Derived Biochar at Different Pyrolysis Temperatures

Figure 2