Research Article

Proximate and Nutritional Composition of Stored Bulb Onions as Affected by Harvest and Postharvest Treatments

Table 2

Treatment effect on proximate analysis of stored bulb onions

TreatmentsMoisture content (%)Weight loss (g)Protein (g/100 g)

75% TF-NC-TB77.48 E89.63 GH0.31 GH
75% TF-NC-TA79.29 DE85.19 HI0.65 CD
75% TF-2WC-TB84.67 B58.16 K0.76 BC
75% TF-2WC-TA86.66 A44.37 L1.02 A
75% TF-1WC-TB80.35 D80.14 IJ0.50 EF
75% TF-1WC-TA82.92 BC74.87 J0.57 DE
50% TF-NC-TB70.62 G118.70 F0.20 HI
50% TF-NC-TA73.79 F110.03 F0.74 BC
50% TF-2WC-TB80.76 CD60.17 K0.78 BC
50% TF-2WC-TA82.78 BC52.10 K1.00 A
50% TF-1WC-TB75.18 F96.20 GH0.44 EFG
50% TF-1WC-TA77.10 E79.26 IJ0.54 DE
25% TF-NC-TB66.79 H219.93 A0.16 I
25% TF-NC-TA69.09 G207.61 B0.37 FG
25% TF-2WC-TB74.64 F142.92 E0.54 DE
25% TF-2WC-TA77.63 E115.70 F0.86 B
25% TF-1WC-TB71.01 G191.63 C0.23 HI
25% TF-1WC-TA73.37 F165.14 D0.44 EFG
value<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
Standard error0.6452.6710.036

Means followed by the same letter within the column are not significantly different based on SNK at alpha = 0.05, n = 108. TF = top fall; WC = weeks of curing; NC = no curing; TA = topping after; TB = topping before.