Allelopathic Potential of Green Manure Cover Crops on Germination and Early Seedling Development of Goose Grass [Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn] and Blackjack (Bidens pilosa L.)
Table 7
Effect of soil incorporated residues of different plant parts of cover crops on emergence (%), dry weight, and seedling vigor index (SVII) of blackjack.
Cover crop
Leaf
% inhibition
Stem
% inhibition
Root
% inhibition
Mean % inhibition
Rank
Emergence (%)
Control
67.0a
67.0a
67.0a
Hyacinth bean
8.0c
88
14.0dc
79
12.0de
82
83
2
Red sunnhemp
8.0c
88
29.0bc
57
19.0cde
72
72
4
Showy rattlebox
39.0b
42
24.0bc
64
5.0e
93
66
8
Common bean
4.0c
94
29.0bc
57
31.0bc
54
68
7
Common rattlepod
34.0b
49
34.0b
49
35.0b
48
49
10
Radish
6.0c
91
28.0bc
58
27.0bcd
60
70
5
Tephrosia
11.0c
84
4.0d
94
10.0e
85
88
1
Black sunnhemp
9.0c
87
29.0bc
57
36.0b
46
63
9
Dry weight (g)
Control
0.074a
0.074a
0.074a
Hyacinth bean
0.009c
88
0.01dc
86
0.008c
89
88
1
Red sunnhemp
0.020bc
73
0.046b
38
0.018bc
76
62
8
Showy rattlebox
0.047b
36
0.029c
61
0.044b
41
46
10
Common bean
0.014c
81
0.028c
62
0.037bc
50
64
6
Common rattlepod
0.018c
76
0.030c
59
0.028bc
62
66
7
Radish
0.021bc
72
0.041b
45
0.035bc
53
56
9
Tephrosia
0.017c
77
0.001d
99
0.022bc
70
82
2
Black sunnhemp
0.023bc
69
0.023dc
69
0.023bc
69
69
4
Seedling vigor index (SVII)
Control
2.30c (5.007)
2.30c (5.007)
2.30c (5.007)
Hyacinth bean
0.77a (0.087)
98
0.83ab (0.190)
96
0.79a (0.132)
97
97
1
Red sunnhemp
0.83a (0.200)
96
1.36c (0.401)
92
0.92abcd (0.359)
93
94
7
Showy rattlebox
1.50b (0.914)
82
1.15abc (0.031)
99
0.83ab (0.197)
96
92
10
Common bean
0.76a (0.082)
98
1.15abc (0.873)
83
1.29de (1.207)
76
86
6
Common rattlepod
0.99a (0.560)
89
1.19bc (0.980)
80
1.12abcde (0.820)
84
84
8
Radish
0.82a (0.192)
96
1.27bc (1.224)
76
1.21cde (1.016)
80
84
9
Tephrosia
0.85a (0.225)
96
0.72a (0.016)
100
0.85abc (0.242)
95
97
2
Black sunnhemp
0.87a (0.280)
94
1.07abc (0.660)
87
1.16bcde (0.960)
81
87
4
Means followed by the same letter in the same column are not significantly different at .,, represent species with mean inhibition over control ≥80%, ≥50%, and ≥20%, respectively. Data were √ (x + 0.5) transformed. Untransformed data given in brackets were used to calculate the inhibition percentages.