Research Article
Boosting Chickpea Production by Optimizing Inter-Row and Intrarow Spacing at Central Highlands of Ethiopia
Table 5
Economic analysis for inter-row and intrarow spacing of chickpea over site and year.
| Treatment | Plants ha−1 | GY (kg ha−1) | AGY (kg ha−1) | GB (ETB) | TCV (ETB) | NB (ETB) | MRR (%) |
| 15 cm × 40 cm | 170,000 | 2144 | 1930 | 67536 | 833 | 66703 | | 15 cm × 30 cm | 220,000 | 2573 | 2316 | 81050 | 1111 | 79939 | 4761 | 10 cm × 40 cm | 250,000 | 2656 | 2390 | 83664 | 1250 | 82414 | 1781 | 10 cm × 30 cm | 330,000 | 2926 | 2633 | 92169 | 1667 | 90502 | 1940 | 15 cm × 20 cm | 330,000 | 1970 | 1773 | 62055 | 1667 | 60388 | | 10 cm × 20 cm | 500,000 | 2441 | 2197 | 76892 | 2500 | 74392 | 1681 | 5 cm × 40 cm | 500,000 | 2695 | 2426 | 84893 | 2500 | 82393 | | 5 cm × 30 cm | 670,000 | 2542 | 2288 | 80073 | 3333 | 76740 | | 5 cm × 20 cm | 1,000,000 | 2466 | 2219 | 77679 | 5000 | 72679 | |
|
|
GY = grain yield, AGY = adjusted grain yield (10% down), GB = gross benefit, TVC = total variable cost, and NB = net benefit.
|