Research Article
Hybrid Vigor and Heritability Estimates in Tomato Crosses Involving Solanum lycopersicum × S. pimpinellifolium under Cool Tropical Monsoon Climate
Table 2
Mean performance of parental lines and F1 hybrids for the floral traits of tomato (Cont’d).
| | | SlL | SlD | OL | OD | OA | OP | SgL | SgD | | Mean ± SE | Mean ± SE | Mean ± SE | Mean ± SE | Mean ± SE | Mean ± SE | Mean ± SE | Mean ± SE |
| | Parents | | W | 0.2 ± 0.02 | 0.1 ± 0.01 | 0.1 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.2 ± 0.02 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.1 ± 0.01 | | H | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.02 | 0.1 ± 0.00 | 0.1 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.2 ± 0.02 | 0.1 ± 0.02 | 0.1 ± 0.02 | | D | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.02 | 0.2 ± 0.03 | 0.2 ± 0.02 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.02 | 0.2 ± 0.02 | | T | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.01 | 0.1 ± 0.02 | 0.1 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.3 ± 0.4 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.1 ± 0.01 | | U | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.01 | 0.2 ± 0.02 | 0.1 ± 0.02 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.02 | 0.1 ± 0.02 |
| | F1hybrids | | H × W | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.00 | 0.1 ± 0.02 | 0.12 ± 0.03 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.02 | 0.1 ± 0.02 | | D × W | 1.0 ± 0.05 | 0.1 ± 0.02 | 0.2 ± 0.03 | 0.3 ± 0.03 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.02 | 0.3 ± 0.02 | | T × W | 0.6 ± 0.02 | 0.1 ± 0.00 | 0.1 ± 0.03 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.1 ± 0.01 | | U × W | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.03 | 0.2 ± 0.02 | 0.2 ± 0.03 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.02 | 0.2 ± 0.02 |
| | LSD | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.02 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | Ns | 0.02 | 0.02 | | 0.01 | 0.1 | 0.03 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | Ns | 0.02 | 0.03 |
|
|
W: wild parent (“LA2093”); H: CLN2714H; D: CLN2498D; T: Tima; U: UC dan INDIA; SlL (mm): style length; SlD (mm): style diameter; OL (mm): ovary length; OD (mm): ovary diameter; OA (mm2): ovary area; OP (mm): ovary perimeter; SgD (mm): stigma diameter; SgL (mm): stigma length; LSD: least significant difference; SE: standard error of a mean.
|
