Rice Yield Improvement by Sugarcane Filter Cake Fertilizer Application in the Protected Dyke
Table 3
Rice yield and yield components of different treatments in the Cho Moi district.
Treatments
Summer collection
Autumn-winter season
Effective panicle/m2(panicle)
Number of seeds/panicle (seeds)
Percentage of filled seeds (%)
Weight of 1000 seeds (g)
Theoretical yield (ton/ha)
Actual yield (ton/ha)
Effective panicle/m2 (panicle)
Number of seeds/panicle (seeds)
Percentage of filled seeds (%)
Weight of 1000 seeds (g)
Theoretical yield (ton/ha)
Actual yield (ton/ha)
NT1
457a
70a
79.6a
25.5a
6.39a
5.04a
371a
90.3ab
86.7b
27.5a
7.88a
4.67b
NT2
479a
63a
84.7a
25.5a
6.40a
5.23a
386a
84.1b
86.7b
27.3a
7.68a
4.94ab
NT3
528a
68.6a
74.3a
25.8a
6.84a
4.95a
362a
80.3b
87.2b
27.8a
7.09a
4.87ab
NT4
454a
71.6a
79.9a
25.3a
6.44a
4.92a
335a
112a
89a
27.5a
8.82a
5.65a
CV (%)
15.4
22.2
6.85
3.32
8.24
10.2
11.5
11.8
0.79
0.88
12.5
8.85
F
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
∗
ns
ns
∗
Note. NT1: fertilize according to farmers (224 kg N + 148 kg P2O5) ha−1. NT2: fertilize according to farmers +6 tons ha−1 cow manure with straw. NT3: fertilize according to farmers +6 tons ha−1 cow manure composted with straw buried 15 cm deep. NT4: fertilize according to farmers +2 tons ha−1 sugarcane filter cakes.
