Research Article

Genetic Variability of Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) Germplasm in Biennial Bearing and Its Influence on Selection Efficiency

Table 8

The top ten high yielders (kg ha−1) and low biennial bearing accessions at Tepi.

GenotypesTop ten high yielder (kg ha−1)GenotypesTop ten very low biennial bearing accessions
20162017201820192020MeanCV (%)I20162017201820192020MeanCV (%)I

T21/111143.81149.11459.5806.22287.011369.1236.760.22T26/11250.2561.6505.4426.3460.4440.7723.940.14
T22/11250.22155.42424.91056.41914.491560.2851.250.38T28/11379.9270.6270.6463.3443.2365.5222.50.11
T36/11444.81980.42420.5818.82153.241563.5550.050.42T32/11656.8418.7523.3333.6506487.6722.220.19
T37/11984.12627.12101.77612716.461838.0744.550.40T33/11762.5656.1664.8852.5856.9758.5711.460.05
T38/11553.52575.91639.2643.43245.451731.4961.040.49T49/11417687.2712.2934.11177785.4732.50.13
T40/11533.83539.51769.7750.61723.61663.4463.870.47T55/11740.2388.2533.8545.9510.8543.7920.80.13
T41/111684.71357.82333.5650.51175.941440.4938.750.31T61/11342.9433.7481.9525.4454.1447.5913.560.07
T42/11708.92520.22772.21334.4528.21572.7858.480.35T62/11386.7398.9435.2375.3583.8435.9817.570.09
T43/1115951916.72635.41683.2576.221681.339.40.24T73/11262.1265.4417379.1215.5307.8124.920.14
T51/111121.31364.42906925.7843.271432.1352.960.26T77/11222.4417486.5393.2342.9372.3923.660.14
CheckMean442.07449.74503.07522.87555.1494.56
Geisha36844759.65707.41058.42713.793584.7450.34
J-1932435485.64220.42245.22009.533440.6537.50.19
Desu23562861.32538.31843.92085.382336.9215.10.09
7454A30973393.45408.11262.41886.233009.3747.50.27
7440A35832461.92640.11477.32639.062560.2126.10.20
Mean672.481055.871121.7545.81801.18839.4126.210.19
CDD (0.05)
CI-CJ734120915763332876870.15
VI-VJ16072649345273063015060.33
CI-VJ1227202326365548111500.25

CD: least significant difference, CV: coefficient of variation, I: intensity of biennial index, Geno.: genotypes, CD: critical difference, CI-CJ: between two control treatments, VI-VJ: between two augmented treatments in different blocks, and CI-VJ: between control treatment and augmented treatment. Note: yield was expressed in kg·ha−1. The bold values show the mean of yield down column of harvesting seasons.