Nominal Performance of Future Dual Frequency Dual Constellation GBAS

<table class="figure-group"><tr class="fig-image" id="a"><td><object data="https://static-preview.hindawi.com/articles/ijae/volume-2016/6835282/figures/6835282.fig.0016a.svgz" name="6835282.fig.0016a" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(a) </b>VPL over distance for two different <svg height="11.6314pt" id="M229" style="vertical-align:-5.48781pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -6.14359 18.755 11.6314" width="18.755pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M548 455L523 469C505 448 490 439 461 439C416 439 374 447 316 447C144 447 23 310 23 161C23 47 89 -12 179 -12C312 -12 429 106 429 244C429 303 419 344 368 386L371 388C404 383 440 378 474 378C507 378 530 411 548 455ZM350 274C350 191 308 25 198 25C144 25 108 75 108 157C108 264 170 395 276 395C296 395 320 384 333 360C347 334 350 316 350 274Z" id="g113-240"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="565" vert-adv-y="565"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,6.76,3.132)"><path d="M487 439H304V409C361 402 367 391 351 344C328 280 297 190 262 110C235 178 192 284 168 353C152 396 153 403 208 409V439H-1V409C54 401 61 394 85 338C133 221 179 111 224 -10H255C312 139 363 260 398 336C426 394 432 401 487 409V439Z" id="g58-116"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="473" vert-adv-y="473"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,11.229,3.132)"><path d="M138 535C169 535 191 560 191 589C191 620 168 644 139 644S85 620 85 589C85 560 110 535 138 535ZM257 0V30C192 35 185 43 185 109V453C142 435 94 422 40 414V386C101 378 104 372 104 311V109C104 41 97 35 33 30V0H257Z" id="g58-103"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="275" vert-adv-y="275"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,13.731,3.132)"><path d="M472 439C432 432 382 428 334 425C303 442 271 451 236 451H235C158 451 54 398 54 285C54 216 97 171 140 152C124 133 93 105 53 90C52 81 55 63 64 48C77 27 102 5 137 -6C115 -22 77 -53 57 -73C40 -88 32 -107 32 -130C32 -189 96 -253 208 -253C340 -253 461 -159 461 -56C461 44 378 63 314 63C281 63 246 62 207 62C163 62 145 80 145 99C145 114 160 130 175 141C191 138 210 136 226 136C314 136 405 188 405 294C405 329 393 359 376 382L433 378C448 387 469 415 477 430L472 439ZM226 417C282 417 320 364 320 288S281 172 236 171C180 171 142 224 142 300S182 417 226 417ZM248 -9C291 -9 319 -11 346 -22S390 -57 390 -90C390 -151 339 -199 246 -199C171 -199 114 -159 114 -106C114 -79 132 -53 159 -30C178 -15 200 -9 248 -9Z" id="g58-101"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="479" vert-adv-y="479"></glyph.data></g></svg> assumptions</td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="b"><td><object data="https://static-preview.hindawi.com/articles/ijae/volume-2016/6835282/figures/6835282.fig.0016b.svgz" name="6835282.fig.0016b" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(b) </b>VPLs over distance for different elevation masks and for DC as well as GPS</td></tr></table>

<div>Comparisons of H0 VPL over distance for changing elevation mask and <svg height="11.6314pt" id="M228" style="vertical-align:-5.48781pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -6.14359 18.755 11.6314" width="18.755pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M548 455L523 469C505 448 490 439 461 439C416 439 374 447 316 447C144 447 23 310 23 161C23 47 89 -12 179 -12C312 -12 429 106 429 244C429 303 419 344 368 386L371 388C404 383 440 378 474 378C507 378 530 411 548 455ZM350 274C350 191 308 25 198 25C144 25 108 75 108 157C108 264 170 395 276 395C296 395 320 384 333 360C347 334 350 316 350 274Z" id="g113-240"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="565" vert-adv-y="565"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,6.76,3.132)"><path d="M487 439H304V409C361 402 367 391 351 344C328 280 297 190 262 110C235 178 192 284 168 353C152 396 153 403 208 409V439H-1V409C54 401 61 394 85 338C133 221 179 111 224 -10H255C312 139 363 260 398 336C426 394 432 401 487 409V439Z" id="g58-116"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="473" vert-adv-y="473"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,11.229,3.132)"><path d="M138 535C169 535 191 560 191 589C191 620 168 644 139 644S85 620 85 589C85 560 110 535 138 535ZM257 0V30C192 35 185 43 185 109V453C142 435 94 422 40 414V386C101 378 104 372 104 311V109C104 41 97 35 33 30V0H257Z" id="g58-103"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="275" vert-adv-y="275"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,13.731,3.132)"><path d="M472 439C432 432 382 428 334 425C303 442 271 451 236 451H235C158 451 54 398 54 285C54 216 97 171 140 152C124 133 93 105 53 90C52 81 55 63 64 48C77 27 102 5 137 -6C115 -22 77 -53 57 -73C40 -88 32 -107 32 -130C32 -189 96 -253 208 -253C340 -253 461 -159 461 -56C461 44 378 63 314 63C281 63 246 62 207 62C163 62 145 80 145 99C145 114 160 130 175 141C191 138 210 136 226 136C314 136 405 188 405 294C405 329 393 359 376 382L433 378C448 387 469 415 477 430L472 439ZM226 417C282 417 320 364 320 288S281 172 236 171C180 171 142 224 142 300S182 417 226 417ZM248 -9C291 -9 319 -11 346 -22S390 -57 390 -90C390 -151 339 -199 246 -199C171 -199 114 -159 114 -106C114 -79 132 -53 159 -30C178 -15 200 -9 248 -9Z" id="g58-101"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="479" vert-adv-y="479"></glyph.data></g></svg>.</div>

International Journal of Aerospace Engineering

fig16

Figure 16

Figure 16: Nominal Performance of Future Dual Frequency Dual Constellation GBAS 