Parametric Design Method and Performance Analysis of Double S-Shaped Nozzles

<table class="figure-group"><tr class="fig-image" id="a"><td><object data="https://static-preview.hindawi.com/articles/ijae/volume-2019/4694837/figures/4694837.fig.0017a.svgz" name="4694837.fig.0017a" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(a) </b>Total pressure recovery coefficient</td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="b"><td><object data="https://static-preview.hindawi.com/articles/ijae/volume-2019/4694837/figures/4694837.fig.0017b.svgz" name="4694837.fig.0017b" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(b) </b>Thrust coefficient</td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="c"><td><object data="https://static-preview.hindawi.com/articles/ijae/volume-2019/4694837/figures/4694837.fig.0017c.svgz" name="4694837.fig.0017c" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(c) </b>Total pressure distortion index</td></tr></table>

<div>Comparison of performances of nozzles with different <svg height="11.439pt" id="M161" style="vertical-align:-2.15067pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -9.28833 29.1461 11.439" width="29.1461pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M962 650H739L732 622L760 619C812 613 819 604 798 552C760 457 671 267 606 131H604L511 638H480L237 131H233L183 554C177 607 183 614 226 619L248 622L257 650H24L17 622C88 615 92 611 103 524L173 -11H203L450 491H453L543 -11H575L839 529C882 609 886 613 953 622L962 650Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,12.669,0)"><path d="M368 703H309L44 -163H104L368 703Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,18.03,0)"><path d="M828 650H570L564 622C646 614 650 609 634 524L604 366H253L281 524C296 608 308 615 382 622L388 650H132L126 622C211 615 214 609 198 524L121 122C106 42 102 35 23 28L17 0H276L282 28C196 35 191 40 206 122L243 324H597L559 123C544 42 537 35 452 28L446 0H710L716 28C632 35 628 43 643 122L719 524C735 610 741 615 822 622L828 650Z"></path></g></svg> (<span class="nowrap"><svg height="11.439pt" id="M162" style="vertical-align:-2.15067pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -9.28833 42.8168 11.439" width="42.8168pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M449 634C442 637 425 643 405 650C376 660 341 666 307 666C181 666 98 590 98 485C98 400 170 343 215 310L246 288C307 243 343 204 343 147C343 67 291 18 219 18C104 18 61 124 51 202L23 199C28 124 27 71 27 47C47 22 122 -16 204 -16C324 -16 428 60 428 174C428 256 379 309 307 360L276 382C223 419 179 455 179 516C179 576 221 632 293 632C379 632 410 564 418 487L448 490C446 536 446 592 449 634Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,6.136,0)"><path d="M368 703H309L44 -163H104L368 703Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,11.497,0)"><path d="M743 375C743 570 607 650 407 650H136L130 622C214 612 220 606 204 526L125 122C110 43 105 36 24 27L17 0H250C382 0 482 23 571 76C680 141 743 248 743 375ZM644 379C644 188 520 36 305 36C277 36 249 38 229 46C205 55 202 71 212 126L293 553C300 588 306 600 317 606C330 613 356 617 390 617C547 617 644 537 644 379Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,25.088,0)"><path d="M535 323V373H52V323H535ZM535 138V188H52V138H535Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,36.35,0)"><path d="M241 635C89 635 35 457 35 312C35 153 89 -12 240 -12C390 -12 443 166 443 312C443 466 390 635 241 635ZM238 602C329 602 354 454 354 312C354 172 330 22 240 22C152 22 124 173 124 313S148 602 238 602Z"></path></g></svg>).</span></div>

International Journal of Aerospace Engineering

fig17

Figure 17

Figure 17: Parametric Design Method and Performance Analysis of Double S-Shaped Nozzles 