International Journal of Aerospace Engineering / 2019 / Article / Tab 5 / Research Article
Vision-Based Satellite Recognition and Pose Estimation Using Gaussian Process Regression Table 5 Pose estimation results on the 1D subset of BUAA-SID 1.5. Results are in bold if the proposed method performs the best and in italic if the second best.
Representation Method MAE (°) (%) (%) (%)BI MCGPR 4.83 53.44 70.11 88.06 MCGPR-ALL 6.13 33.67 53.56 78.72 GPR 11.4 22.00 38.33 61.00 GPR-ALL 14.46 10.28 21.33 45.61 Kernel method [19 ] 4.84 53.33 70.17 88.22 DT MCGPR 6.78 48.94 63.22 78.72 MCGPR-ALL 8.82 20.67 39.22 67.50 GPR 14.8 18.39 32.50 52.33 GPR-ALL 20.60 5.83 11.39 28.06 Kernel method [19 ] 6.07 53.67 68.33 82.56 HU MCGPR 57.3 4.28 8.17 17.50 MCGPR-ALL 75.21 1.33 2.33 6.56 GPR 69.5 1.06 2.39 5.17 GPR-ALL 83.94 0.67 1.33 2.89 kernel method [19 ] 80.37 1.22 2.61 6.44 FD MCGPR 23.2 8.44 16.94 35.78 MCGPR-ALL 34.81 3.50 7.11 16.89 GPR 38.9 3.17 6.78 14.94 GPR-ALL 56.54 0.94 2.39 6.22 Kernel method [19 ] 27.09 8.50 16.28 32.83 GI MCGPR 0.29 93.06 98.00 99.72 MCGPR-ALL 0.43 90.44 96.56 99.50 GPR 3.02 52.33 72.44 90.67 GPR-ALL 3.84 38.89 62.00 86.72 Kernel method [19 ] 0.29 93.06 97.94 99.72 ResNet [46 ] 4.5206 17.22 31.67 74.44 DenseNet [47 ] 22.41 2.22 6.11 15.56 HOG MCGPR 5.32 43.61 64.72 82.83 MCGPR-ALL 6.04 27.44 48.61 77 GPR 15.5 9.67 18.89 42.06 GPR-ALL 16.51 6.61 13.67 35.11 Kernel method [19 ] 5.36 43.50 64.72 82.94