Research Article
Continuous-Thrust Station-Keeping of Cis-Lunar Orbits Using Optimal Sliding Mode Control with Practical Constraints
Table 7
The performance indexes of the station-keeping simulations with practical constraints and different perturbations.
| | Orbit | Method | Perturbation | Success rate | Annual cost (m/s) | Mean deviation (km) | Max deviation (km) |
| | 2 : 1 DRO | LQR | None | 100% | 0.7815 | 1.6019 | 25.0749 | | Jupiter gravity | 100% | 0.7793 | 1.5967 | 26.8166 | | SRP | 100% | 20.1879 | 31.2896 | 42.7020 | | OSMC | None | 100% | 0.7844 | 1.5971 | 27.2347 | | Jupiter gravity | 100% | 0.7889 | 1.6018 | 26.7305 | | SRP | 100% | 35.9396 | 23.8093 | 36.4045 |
| | Halo (3) | LQR | None | 100% | 1.7899 | 1.4281 | 28.4272 | | Jupiter gravity | 100% | 1.7814 | 1.4232 | 27.6717 | | SRP | 100% | 29.3677 | 21.1300 | 40.6760 | | OSMC | None | 100% | 1.7722 | 1.4091 | 25.5064 | | Jupiter gravity | 100% | 1.7792 | 1.4163 | 26.5918 | | SRP | 100% | 41.3024 | 16.7514 | 35.9938 |
|
|
