Simulation of Airborne Antenna Array Layout Problems Using Parallel Higher-Order MoM

<table>2D gain patterns of the microstrip patch array antenna: (a) <svg height="12.5125" id="M78" style="vertical-align:-2.29482pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 26.387501 12.5125" width="26.387501" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,8.012)"><path d="M556 393q0 -39 -36 -106q-42 -78 -185 -279q-47 -66 -81 -108t-117 -135l-112 -26l-8 22q150 90 251 219q-6 136 -39 340q-8 53 -21 53q-6 0 -27 -19.5t-38 -42.5l-16 26q80 111 127 111q23 0 35 -28t20 -90q18 -137 27 -263h2q142 200 142 279q0 24 -14 48q-4 7 5 26
q13 28 43 28q18 0 30 -15.5t12 -39.5z" id="x1D466"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,9.905,8.012)"><path d="M445 282q0 -64 -27.5 -125t-80.5 -104q-80 -65 -168 -65q-73 0 -109.5 46.5t-36.5 116.5q0 92 46.5 163t119.5 104q66 30 108 30q67 0 107.5 -43.5t40.5 -122.5zM355 280q0 62 -26.5 94.5t-64.5 32.5q-26 0 -44 -8q-39 -18 -74 -82t-35 -163q0 -57 25.5 -90.5t70.5 -33.5
q22 0 36 6q46 20 79 89t33 155z" id="x1D45C"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,17.86,8.012)"><path d="M475 445l-64 -69q-119 -128 -289 -280q27 6 81 -15q66 -26 102 -26q48 0 111 93l23 -19q-41 -84 -75.5 -116.5t-73.5 -32.5q-37 0 -147 53q-43 21 -63 7q-22 -15 -38 -41q-4 -7 -11 -7q-8 10 -8 26q0 38 47 83l292 273q-32 -5 -67 -1q-63 7 -105 7q-32 0 -53.5 -22
t-47.5 -67l-25 13q15 39 38 78q40 66 83 66q57 0 120 -12q52 -10 80 -10q29 0 67 42z" id="x1D467"></path></g>
</svg> plane and (b) <svg height="12.175" id="M79" style="vertical-align:-2.29482pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 27.424999 12.175" width="27.424999" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,7.675)"><path d="M536 404q0 -17 -13.5 -31.5t-26.5 -14.5q-8 0 -15 10q-11 14 -25 14q-22 0 -67 -50q-47 -52 -68 -82l37 -102q31 -88 55 -88t78 59l16 -23q-32 -48 -68.5 -78t-65.5 -30q-19 0 -37.5 20t-29.5 53l-41 116q-72 -106 -114.5 -147.5t-79.5 -41.5q-21 0 -34.5 14t-13.5 37
q0 16 13.5 31.5t28.5 15.5q12 0 17 -11q5 -10 25 -10q22 0 57.5 36t89.5 111l-40 108q-22 58 -36 58q-21 0 -67 -57l-19 20q81 107 125 107q17 0 30 -22t39 -88l22 -55q68 92 108.5 128.5t74.5 36.5q20 0 32.5 -14t12.5 -30z" id="x1D465"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,9.565,7.675)"><path d="M445 282q0 -64 -27.5 -125t-80.5 -104q-80 -65 -168 -65q-73 0 -109.5 46.5t-36.5 116.5q0 92 46.5 163t119.5 104q66 30 108 30q67 0 107.5 -43.5t40.5 -122.5zM355 280q0 62 -26.5 94.5t-64.5 32.5q-26 0 -44 -8q-39 -18 -74 -82t-35 -163q0 -57 25.5 -90.5t70.5 -33.5
q22 0 36 6q46 20 79 89t33 155z" id="x1D45C"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,17.52,7.675)"><path d="M556 393q0 -39 -36 -106q-42 -78 -185 -279q-47 -66 -81 -108t-117 -135l-112 -26l-8 22q150 90 251 219q-6 136 -39 340q-8 53 -21 53q-6 0 -27 -19.5t-38 -42.5l-16 26q80 111 127 111q23 0 35 -28t20 -90q18 -137 27 -263h2q142 200 142 279q0 24 -14 48q-4 7 5 26
q13 28 43 28q18 0 30 -15.5t12 -39.5z" id="x1D466"></path></g>
</svg> plane.</table>

International Journal of Antennas and Propagation

fig6

Figure 6

Figure 6: Simulation of Airborne Antenna Array Layout Problems Using Parallel Higher-Order MoM 