Research Article

A Compact Triple Band EBG Using Interdigital Coplanar Waveguide Structure for Antenna Gain Enhancement

Table 3

Comparison of the presented antenna with reference EBG unit cell and antennas.

Reference numberNo. of bands (structure shaped)Freq.(GHz)Unit cell size (mm3)Overall size (mm3)No. of unit cell arrayIBW (%)Measurement gain (dB)

[11]1 (fractal)11.3511 × 11 × 1.677 × 77 × 1.67 × 77.3-
1 (fork like)11.516 × 16 × 1.6112 × 112 × 1.67.0
1 (spiral)1.9510 × 10 × 1.670 × 70 × 1.60.3

[12]1(ID-UC)2.357.3 × 7.3 × 1.514.6 × 36.5 × 1.52 × 546-

[13]3 (double slotted)2.42–2.955 × 5 × 2.7415 × 15 × 2.743 × 319.70
3 (triple side slotted)5.82–6.305 × 5 × 2.7415 × 15 × 2.743 × 37.80
8.27–9.286.20
4.29–4.658.00
5.56–6.2810.38
7.90–7.944.30

[16]2 (slot ant. fed by CPW)2.50–5.3076 × 61 × 0.50876 × 93 × 0.508178.95-
13.5–16.318.79-

[20]1 (interdigital and inductive strip)2.44–2.517 × 8.1 × 4.328.3 × 44.8 × 4.33 × 43.047.0

[23]4 (slot ant. with spiral stub and interdigital CPW feed)1.72–2.023.25 × 27.5 × 1.623.25 × 40 × 1.6115.041.92
2.34–2.6311.662.03
3.54–3.9510.942.16
5.10–5.324.212.36

[25]1 (interdigital cap. loaded slot)2.4516.3×3.916.3×3.9118.72.075

[29]1 (square patch AMC substrate and PRS superstrate)14.04.5 × 4.5 × 1.13150 × 150 × 11.332 × 32>3019.0

[30]2 (EBG with circular slot)3.53–3.874.8 × 3.0 × 1.2733 × 21 × 1.274 × 68.96.71
4.35–4.697.524.58

ICPW-EBG proposed3 (ICPW)1.8 2.4518 × 18 × 3.2181.8 × 181.8 × 24.210 × 1040.64 30.72 43.828.72 8.56 8.10
3.7