Research Article
Near-Field HF-RFID and CMA-Based Circularly Polarized Far-Field UHF-RFID Integrated Tag Antenna
Table 3
Performance comparison of the proposed integrated HF-RFID and UHF-RFID tag antenna with current state of the art in RFID tag antennas.
| Reference | Dimension (mm) | Frequency band operation | % fractional bandwidth in UHF band ( ≤ −10 dB) | Polarization type in UHF band | % fractional bandwidth of CP in UHF band (AR ≤ 3 dB) |
| Proposed | 95 × 95 × 0.8 | HF/UHF | 4.44 | Circular pol. | 6.87 | [4] | 54 × 85 × 0.8 | HF/UHF | 4.01 | Linear pol. | — | [5] | 49 × 83 × 0.7 | HF/UHF | 0.12 | Linear pol. | — | [6] | 54 × 84 × 0.8 | HF/UHF | 3.36 | Linear pol. | — | [7] | 60 × 100 × 0.8 | HF/UHF | 0.58 | Linear pol. | — | [8] | 40 × 40 × 3.14 | UHF | 3.45 | Circular pol. | 1.08 | [9] | 74 × 74 × 1.6 | UHF | 25.98 | Circular pol. | 0.65 | [10] | 100 × 100 × 1.6 | UHF | 1.85 | Circular pol. | 0.86 | [11] | 60 × 60 × 1.6 | UHF | 3.55 | Circular pol. | 0.97 | [12] | 80 × 80 × 1.6 | UHF | 1.53 | Circular pol. | 1.76 | [13] | 85 × 85 × 0.4 | UHF | 3.61 | Circular pol. | 3.50 | [14] | 58.6 × 58.6 × 0.4 | UHF | 2.91 | Circular pol. | 0.86 | [15] | 35.6 × 35.6 × 0.508 | UHF | 4.06 | Circular pol. | 1.25 | [16] | 75 × 75 × 0.565 | UHF | 12.53 | Circular pol. | 2.92 | [17] | 56 × 56 × 0.4 | UHF | 14.41 | Circular pol. | 1.64 | [18] | 90 × 90 × 0.15 | UHF | 5.65 | Circular pol. | 5.45 | [19] | 127 × 127 × 0.15 | UHF | 7.58 | Circular pol. | 6.01 | [20] | 54 × 54 × 0.2 | UHF | 10.99 | Circular pol. | 3.91 |
|
|