Research Article
Decoupling Technique Using Ferrite-Film Loading for 5G MIMO Applications
Table 2
Comparison of the proposed antenna with existing works.
| Ref. | Element size (L × × H mm3) | Method | Bandwidth | Isolation (dB) | Element distance (mm) | Efficiency |
| [8] | 16 × 5 × 1 | Decoupling-loop | 8.9% (3.33–3.65 GHz) | 13 | 1 | 65–80% | [11] | 11 × 43.5 × 1 | Tapered-slot-etched method | 40.8% (1.7–2.7 GHz) | 40 | 8.5 | — | [12] | 28 × 1 × 29 | Parasitic structure | 5% (2.33–2.45 GHz) | 25 | 28 | 72–83% | [16] | 6.7 × 15.5 × 3.08 | Self-neutralized technique | 4.1% (4.8–5.0 GHz) | 23 | 3.2 | 78–80% | [17] | 27.3 × 27.3 × 3.175 | Weak field | 5.7% (3.4–3.6 GHz) | 12.0 | 6.5 | — | [21] | 35 × 45 × 1.6 | Metamaterial | 8.8% (9.12–9.96 GHz) | 10 | 20 | — | [37] | 20 × 32 × 1.6 | Extra branch | 14.3% (3.3–3.8 GHz) | 14 | 2 | 68–80% | [39] | 9.6 × 3 × 0.8 | Lumped components | 3.9% (3.42–3.59 GHz) | 13.5 | 1 | 32–51% | This work | 11.3 × 4 × 1 | Ferrite loading | 9.1% (3.35–3.67 GHz) | 10.43 | 1.4 | 43–45.5% |
|
|