Accurate Empirical Path Loss Models with Route Classification for mmWave Communications

Table 6

Comparison of NLOS path loss models.

Name	NLOS models		MAE of Route (STDEV)
			Hard	Soft	All
5GCM UMi street canyon	(i)		10.46 (5.70)	4.70 (3.94)4	7.65 (5,42)
			6.56 (5.77)	.71 (3.76)	7.89 (5.45)
3GPP UMi street canyon	(i) Option (CI)		11.23 (5.81)	4.75 (3.65)	9.72 (6.45)
			10.08 (5.68)	4.84 (4.10)	7.49 (5.33)
METIS		None (0.45≤f ≤ 6 GHz)	—	—
mmMAGIC			15.25 (5.93)	28.79 (6.10)	21.19 (8.73)
Proposed (28 GHz)	(i) Soft		5.04 (4.0)	3.52 (3.15)
	(ii) Hard			—
	(iii) All				7.51 (5.47)
Proposed (73 GHz)	(i) Soft		—	3.76 (3.59)
	(ii) Hard		4.2 (3.75)	—
	(iii) All				6.47 (4.75)
Proposed (dual freq.)	(i) Soft			4.34 (3.53)
	Option (ABG)			4.38 (3.47)
	(ii) Hard		4.46 (3.79)
	Option (ABG)		4.45 (3.81)
	(iii) All			—	6.72 (4.91)
	Option (ABG)				6.78 (4.88)