Research Article
Low-Cost Lens Antenna Design for Microwave Moisture Detection
Table 2
Performance comparison among different antennas.
| Reference | Bandwidth(GHz) | Maximumrealizedgain (dBi) | Antennasize (mm) | Structuralcomplexity | Lens | Application |
| [1] | 2.45 | Unknown | 140 × 140 | Simple | No | Moisture content measuring | [7] | 0–30 | 7 | 50 × 66.4 | Simple | Yes | High dynamic-range imaging | [8] | 1.54–7 | 9.8 | 88 × 75 | Simple | No | Breast phantom measurement | [11] | 2–8, 8–40 | 12.1 | 130 × 130 × 243 | Complex | No | Radio-frequency simulation system | [13] | 1.38–13.8 | 12.6 | 182 × 96 × 6.1 | Simple | No | Communication and radar technologies | [18] | 4–40 | 7.8 | 80 × 80 × 94 | Simple | No | Mobile infrastructure | [19] | 4–13 | 9.2 | 40 × 4 × 0.8 | Complex | No | High dynamic-range imaging | This work | 5-6 | 16.5 | 100 × 85 × 1.6 | Simple | Yes | Moisture content measuring |
|
|